VulnerabilityPublished 12 Sep 2025

CVE-2025-10274: erjinzhi 10OA · Cross-site Scripting

Affects erjinzhi 10OASource CVE Database V5

Public exploit available · CVSS 5.3 Medium.

Data as of 26 Oct 2026, 17:16 UTC

CVSS 4.0 base score

5.3Medium

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 0.3% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 29% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P

Base metrics

Attack Vector: Network
Attack Complexity: Low
Attack Requirements: None
Privileges Required: None
User Interaction: Passive
Vulnerable system confidentiality: None
Vulnerable system integrity: Low
Vulnerable system availability: None
Subsequent system confidentiality: None
Subsequent system integrity: None
Subsequent system availability: None

Threat metrics

Exploit Maturity: POC

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable system is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed below, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed “remotely exploitable” and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity: Low: The attacker must take no measurable action to exploit the vulnerability. The attack requires no target-specific circumvention to exploit the vulnerability. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable system.
Attack Requirements: None: The successful attack does not depend on the deployment and execution conditions of the vulnerable system. The attacker can expect to be able to reach the vulnerability and execute the exploit under all or most instances of the vulnerability.
Privileges Required: None: The attacker is unauthorized prior to attack, and therefore does not require any access to settings or files of the vulnerable system to carry out an attack.
User Interaction: Passive: Successful exploitation of this vulnerability requires limited interaction by the targeted user with the vulnerable system and the attacker’s payload. These interactions would be considered involuntary and do not require that the user actively subvert protections built into the vulnerable system.
Vulnerable system confidentiality: None: There is no loss of confidentiality within the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system integrity: Low: Modification of data is possible, but the attacker does not have control over the consequence of a modification, or the amount of modification is limited. The data modification does not have a direct, serious impact to the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system confidentiality: None: There is no loss of confidentiality within the Subsequent System or all confidentiality impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the Subsequent System or all integrity impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the Subsequent System or all availability impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Exploit Maturity: POC: Based on threat intelligence sources each of the following must apply: · Proof-of-concept is publicly available · No knowledge of reported attempts to exploit this vulnerability · No knowledge of publicly available solutions used to simplify attempts to exploit the vulnerability

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v4.0 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 12 Sep 2025
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: evidence found.
CVSS exploit maturity: proof of concept public
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), CVSS vector, the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 26 Oct 2026.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC or the CVSS exploit maturity reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
erjinzhi 10OA	Affected =1.0	Fixed in–

AI-suggested

Given the absence of an official patch, European organizations should implement immediate compensating controls. These include deploying web application firewalls (WAFs) with custom rules to detect and block malicious payloads targeting the 'Name' parameter in the /trial/mvc/item endpoint. Input validation and output encoding should be enforced at the application level if source code access is available, sanitizing user inputs to neutralize script injection. Organizations should conduct user awareness training to recognize and avoid phishing attempts that could trigger the exploit. Network segmentation can limit exposure of the erjinzhi 10OA application to only trusted internal users. Monitoring and logging web traffic for anomalous requests targeting the vulnerable endpoint can help detect exploitation attempts early. Finally, organizations should engage with the vendor for updates and consider alternative solutions if the vendor remains unresponsive.

Description

A security flaw has been discovered in erjinzhi 10OA 1.0. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality of the file /trial/mvc/item. Performing manipulation of the argument Name results in cross site scripting. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been released to the public and may be exploited. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Impact

For European organizations using erjinzhi 10OA 1.0, this XSS vulnerability poses a moderate risk. Successful exploitation could lead to session hijacking, unauthorized access to sensitive information, or manipulation of user actions within the application, potentially disrupting business processes or exposing confidential data. Since the vulnerability requires user interaction, phishing or social engineering campaigns could be used to lure employees into triggering the exploit. The lack of vendor response and patch availability increases exposure duration. Organizations in sectors with high regulatory requirements for data protection, such as finance, healthcare, and government, could face compliance risks if sensitive data is compromised. Additionally, the presence of a public exploit increases the likelihood of targeted or opportunistic attacks, especially in environments where erjinzhi 10OA is integrated into critical workflows.

Summary

CVE-2025-10274 is a cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability identified in erjinzhi 10OA version 1.0, specifically within an unspecified functionality of the /trial/mvc/item endpoint. The vulnerability arises from improper sanitization or validation of the 'Name' parameter, allowing an attacker to inject malicious scripts. This flaw can be exploited remotely without requiring authentication or privileges, and user interaction is necessary to trigger the malicious payload, consistent with reflected XSS behavior. The vulnerability has a CVSS 4.0 base score of 5.3, indicating a medium severity level. The attack vector is network-based with low attack complexity and no privileges or user authentication required, but user interaction is needed to execute the attack. The impact primarily affects confidentiality and integrity to a limited extent, as the vulnerability allows execution of arbitrary scripts in the context of the victim's browser, potentially leading to session hijacking, credential theft, or unauthorized actions within the affected application. The vendor has been contacted but has not responded or issued a patch, and no known exploits are currently observed in the wild, although a public exploit has been released. This increases the risk of exploitation by opportunistic attackers. The erjinzhi 10OA product is an office automation platform, likely used in enterprise environments for workflow and document management, making the vulnerability relevant to organizations relying on this software for internal operations.

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…

Exploitation evidence

What to do

Affected software

Description

AI analysisMachine-generated, updated 19 Sep 2025, 01:02 UTC

Technical details

References

Community reviews

Related threats