CVE-2025-10319VulnerabilityPublished 12 Sep 2025

CVE-2025-10319: JeecgBoot · Improper Authorization

Affects JeecgBootSource CVE Database V5

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 5.3 Medium.

Data as of 25 Oct 2026, 19:02 UTC

CVSS 4.0 base score

5.3Medium

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 0.3% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 26% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P

Base metrics

Attack Vector: Network
Attack Complexity: Low
Attack Requirements: None
Privileges Required: Low
User Interaction: None
Vulnerable system confidentiality: Low
Vulnerable system integrity: None
Vulnerable system availability: None
Subsequent system confidentiality: None
Subsequent system integrity: None
Subsequent system availability: None

Threat metrics

Exploit Maturity: POC

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable system is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed below, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed “remotely exploitable” and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity: Low: The attacker must take no measurable action to exploit the vulnerability. The attack requires no target-specific circumvention to exploit the vulnerability. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable system.
Attack Requirements: None: The successful attack does not depend on the deployment and execution conditions of the vulnerable system. The attacker can expect to be able to reach the vulnerability and execute the exploit under all or most instances of the vulnerability.
Privileges Required: Low: The attacker requires privileges that provide basic capabilities that are typically limited to settings and resources owned by a single low-privileged user. Alternatively, an attacker with Low privileges has the ability to access only non-sensitive resources.
User Interaction: None: The vulnerable system can be exploited without interaction from any human user, other than the attacker.
Vulnerable system confidentiality: Low: There is some loss of confidentiality. Access to some restricted information is obtained, but the attacker does not have control over what information is obtained, or the amount or kind of loss is limited. The information disclosure does not cause a direct, serious loss to the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system confidentiality: None: There is no loss of confidentiality within the Subsequent System or all confidentiality impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the Subsequent System or all integrity impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the Subsequent System or all availability impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Exploit Maturity: POC: Based on threat intelligence sources each of the following must apply: · Proof-of-concept is publicly available · No knowledge of reported attempts to exploit this vulnerability · No knowledge of publicly available solutions used to simplify attempts to exploit the vulnerability

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v4.0 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 12 Sep 2025
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 2026-10-25.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
JeecgBoot	Affected =3.8.0 =3.8.1 =3.8.2	Fixed in–

AI-suggested

1. Immediate mitigation should include restricting network access to the /sys/tenant/exportLog endpoint through firewall rules or web application firewalls (WAFs) to limit exposure only to trusted internal IPs or VPN users. 2. Implement strict access control policies at the application or API gateway level to enforce tenant isolation and authorization checks manually if possible. 3. Monitor logs and network traffic for unusual access patterns to the exportLog endpoint, including unexpected remote requests or large data exports. 4. If feasible, disable or restrict the tenant log export functionality until a vendor patch or official fix is available. 5. Conduct a thorough review of tenant data access permissions and audit existing user roles to ensure least privilege principles are enforced. 6. Engage with the JeecgBoot community or maintainers to seek updates or unofficial patches and consider upgrading to newer versions once fixed. 7. Prepare incident response plans specific to data exposure incidents involving tenant logs to minimize impact if exploitation occurs.

Description

A security flaw has been discovered in JeecgBoot up to 3.8.2. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality of the file /sys/tenant/exportLog of the component Tenant Log Export. The manipulation results in improper authorization. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been released to the public and may be exploited. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Impact

For European organizations using JeecgBoot, particularly those deploying multi-tenant applications or services, this vulnerability poses a risk of unauthorized data exposure. Tenant logs often contain sensitive operational information, user activity, or configuration details that could be leveraged by attackers for lateral movement or to compromise additional systems. The improper authorization flaw could lead to breaches of confidentiality, undermining compliance with GDPR and other data protection regulations prevalent in Europe. Organizations in sectors such as finance, healthcare, and public administration, which often use multi-tenant platforms and are subject to strict data privacy laws, may face regulatory penalties and reputational damage if tenant data is exposed. Additionally, the lack of vendor response and absence of patches increases the window of exposure, requiring organizations to implement compensating controls promptly. The medium severity rating suggests that while the vulnerability is not critical, it should be addressed swiftly to prevent exploitation, especially given the public availability of an exploit.

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…

Exploitation evidence

What to do

Affected software

Description

AI analysisMachine-generated, updated 12 Sep 2025, 23:19 UTC

Technical details

References

Community reviews

Related threats