VulnerabilityPublished 12 Sep 2025

CVE-2025-10320: iteachyou Dreamer CMS · Weak Password Requirements

Affects iteachyou Dreamer CMSSource CVE Database V5

Public exploit available · CVSS 2.3 Low.

Data as of 26 Oct 2026, 14:05 UTC

CVSS 4.0 base score

2.3Low

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 0.2% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 15% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P

Base metrics

Attack Vector: Network
Attack Complexity: High
Attack Requirements: None
Privileges Required: Low
User Interaction: None
Vulnerable system confidentiality: None
Vulnerable system integrity: Low
Vulnerable system availability: None
Subsequent system confidentiality: None
Subsequent system integrity: None
Subsequent system availability: None

Threat metrics

Exploit Maturity: POC

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable system is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed below, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed “remotely exploitable” and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity: High: The successful attack depends on the evasion or circumvention of security-enhancing techniques in place that would otherwise hinder the attack. These include: Evasion of exploit mitigation techniques, for example, circumvention of address space randomization (ASLR) or data execution prevention (DEP) must be performed for the attack to be successful; Obtaining target-specific secrets. The attacker must gather some target-specific secret before the attack can be successful. A secret is any piece of information that cannot be obtained through any amount of reconnaissance. To obtain the secret the attacker must perform additional attacks or break otherwise secure measures (e.g. knowledge of a secret key may be needed to break a crypto channel). This operation must be performed for each attacked target.
Attack Requirements: None: The successful attack does not depend on the deployment and execution conditions of the vulnerable system. The attacker can expect to be able to reach the vulnerability and execute the exploit under all or most instances of the vulnerability.
Privileges Required: Low: The attacker requires privileges that provide basic capabilities that are typically limited to settings and resources owned by a single low-privileged user. Alternatively, an attacker with Low privileges has the ability to access only non-sensitive resources.
User Interaction: None: The vulnerable system can be exploited without interaction from any human user, other than the attacker.
Vulnerable system confidentiality: None: There is no loss of confidentiality within the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system integrity: Low: Modification of data is possible, but the attacker does not have control over the consequence of a modification, or the amount of modification is limited. The data modification does not have a direct, serious impact to the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system confidentiality: None: There is no loss of confidentiality within the Subsequent System or all confidentiality impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the Subsequent System or all integrity impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the Subsequent System or all availability impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Exploit Maturity: POC: Based on threat intelligence sources each of the following must apply: · Proof-of-concept is publicly available · No knowledge of reported attempts to exploit this vulnerability · No knowledge of publicly available solutions used to simplify attempts to exploit the vulnerability

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v4.0 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 12 Sep 2025
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: evidence found.
CVSS exploit maturity: proof of concept public
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), CVSS vector, the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 26 Oct 2026.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC or the CVSS exploit maturity reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
iteachyou Dreamer CMS	Affected =4.1.3.0 =4.1.3.1 =4.1.3.2	Fixed in–

AI-suggested

Given the absence of an official patch, European organizations should implement compensating controls to mitigate this vulnerability. These include enforcing strong password policies at the application or network level, such as integrating external authentication mechanisms (e.g., LDAP, SSO) that enforce robust password complexity and rotation policies. Monitoring and logging password change attempts on the /admin/user/updatePwd endpoint can help detect suspicious activity. Restricting access to the administration interface by IP whitelisting or VPN-only access can reduce exposure. Additionally, organizations should consider deploying web application firewalls (WAFs) with custom rules to detect and block attempts to exploit weak password requirements. Regular security audits and penetration testing focused on authentication mechanisms are recommended. Finally, organizations should maintain close communication with the vendor for any updates and consider migrating to alternative CMS solutions if the vendor remains unresponsive.

Description

A vulnerability was detected in iteachyou Dreamer CMS up to 4.1.3.2. This issue affects some unknown processing of the file /admin/user/updatePwd. Performing manipulation results in weak password requirements. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. A high degree of complexity is needed for the attack. The exploitability is assessed as difficult. The exploit is now public and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Impact

For European organizations using iteachyou Dreamer CMS, this vulnerability could lead to weakened password policies that reduce the overall security of administrative accounts. While the direct impact is low, the risk lies in the potential for attackers to gain unauthorized access through compromised weak passwords, especially if combined with other vulnerabilities or social engineering attacks. This could lead to unauthorized changes in website content, data manipulation, or further lateral movement within the network. Organizations in sectors with strict regulatory requirements for data protection (e.g., GDPR) may face compliance risks if weak password policies lead to breaches. The lack of vendor response and patch availability increases the risk exposure duration. However, the high complexity and low exploitability reduce the immediate threat level. European entities relying on Dreamer CMS for critical web infrastructure should be aware of this risk and monitor for any emerging exploit attempts.

Summary

CVE-2025-10320 identifies a vulnerability in the iteachyou Dreamer CMS versions up to 4.1.3.2. The issue arises from weak password requirements during the password update process handled by the /admin/user/updatePwd endpoint. This flaw allows an attacker to manipulate the password update mechanism to set weak passwords, potentially lowering the security posture of user accounts. The vulnerability is remotely exploitable without user interaction and does not require elevated privileges beyond low-level privileges, but it does require a high degree of attack complexity, making exploitation difficult. The CVSS 4.0 base score is 2.3, indicating a low severity primarily due to the complexity and limited impact scope. The weakness affects the integrity of user credentials by allowing weaker passwords, which could facilitate unauthorized access if combined with other attack vectors. The vendor was notified but has not responded or provided a patch, and no known exploits are currently observed in the wild. The vulnerability does not impact confidentiality or availability directly but poses a risk to account integrity and potentially to the broader system if weak passwords are exploited further.

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…