CVE-2025-13584VulnerabilityPublished 24 Nov 2025

CVE-2025-13584: Eigenfocus · Cross Site Scripting

Affects EigenfocusSource CVE Database V5

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 5.1 Medium.

Data as of 26 Oct 2026, 06:26 UTC

CVSS 4.0 base score

5.1Medium

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 0.2% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 18% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P

Base metrics

Attack Vector: Network
Attack Complexity: Low
Attack Requirements: None
Privileges Required: Low
User Interaction: Passive
Vulnerable system confidentiality: None
Vulnerable system integrity: Low
Vulnerable system availability: None
Subsequent system confidentiality: None
Subsequent system integrity: None
Subsequent system availability: None

Threat metrics

Exploit Maturity: POC

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable system is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed below, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed “remotely exploitable” and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity: Low: The attacker must take no measurable action to exploit the vulnerability. The attack requires no target-specific circumvention to exploit the vulnerability. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable system.
Attack Requirements: None: The successful attack does not depend on the deployment and execution conditions of the vulnerable system. The attacker can expect to be able to reach the vulnerability and execute the exploit under all or most instances of the vulnerability.
Privileges Required: Low: The attacker requires privileges that provide basic capabilities that are typically limited to settings and resources owned by a single low-privileged user. Alternatively, an attacker with Low privileges has the ability to access only non-sensitive resources.
User Interaction: Passive: Successful exploitation of this vulnerability requires limited interaction by the targeted user with the vulnerable system and the attacker’s payload. These interactions would be considered involuntary and do not require that the user actively subvert protections built into the vulnerable system.
Vulnerable system confidentiality: None: There is no loss of confidentiality within the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system integrity: Low: Modification of data is possible, but the attacker does not have control over the consequence of a modification, or the amount of modification is limited. The data modification does not have a direct, serious impact to the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system confidentiality: None: There is no loss of confidentiality within the Subsequent System or all confidentiality impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the Subsequent System or all integrity impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the Subsequent System or all availability impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Exploit Maturity: POC: Based on threat intelligence sources each of the following must apply: · Proof-of-concept is publicly available · No knowledge of reported attempts to exploit this vulnerability · No knowledge of publicly available solutions used to simplify attempts to exploit the vulnerability

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v4.0 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 24 Nov 2025
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 2026-10-26.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
GitHubeigenfocus/eigenfocus`pkg:github/eigenfocus/eigenfocus`Other threats	Affected =1.0 =1.1 =1.2 =1.3 =1.4.0	Fixed in–

Check your own hosts for these packages with threat-finder (opens in a new tab), our free open-source scanner.

AI-suggested

1. Immediate upgrade to Eigenfocus version 1.4.1 to apply the official patch addressing CVE-2025-13584. 2. Implement strict input validation and output encoding on all user-supplied data, especially for the entry.description and time_entry.description fields, to prevent injection of malicious scripts. 3. Deploy Content Security Policy (CSP) headers to restrict the execution of unauthorized scripts and reduce the impact of potential XSS payloads. 4. Conduct regular security audits and penetration testing focusing on web application input handling and XSS vulnerabilities. 5. Educate users about the risks of clicking on suspicious links or interacting with untrusted content within the application. 6. Monitor application logs and network traffic for unusual activity that may indicate attempted exploitation. 7. If immediate patching is not feasible, consider temporary mitigations such as web application firewalls (WAFs) configured to detect and block XSS attack patterns targeting the vulnerable parameters. 8. Review and harden session management mechanisms to limit the impact of session hijacking attempts.

Description

A security vulnerability has been detected in Eigenfocus up to 1.4.0. This vulnerability affects unknown code of the component Description Handler. The manipulation of the argument entry.description/time_entry.description leads to cross site scripting. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used. Upgrading to version 1.4.1 is able to resolve this issue. The identifier of the patch is 7dec94c9d1f3e513e0ee38ba68caaba628e08582. Upgrading the affected component is advised.

Impact

For European organizations, this vulnerability poses a moderate risk primarily to confidentiality and integrity of user sessions and data. Successful exploitation could lead to session hijacking, unauthorized actions performed on behalf of users, theft of sensitive information, or defacement of web interfaces. Organizations relying on Eigenfocus for project or time management may face operational disruptions and reputational damage if user accounts are compromised. The remote attack vector and lack of required privileges increase the threat surface, especially in environments where users access the application via browsers. Although no known exploits are active, the public disclosure means attackers could develop exploits rapidly. The impact is heightened in sectors with sensitive data or regulatory requirements such as finance, healthcare, and government. Additionally, organizations with large user bases or those integrating Eigenfocus with other internal systems may experience broader lateral impact if attackers leverage XSS to escalate privileges or move within networks.

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…