CVE-2025-27453VulnerabilityPublished 3 Jul 2025

CVE-2025-27453: Endress+Hauser MEAC300-FNADE4 · Sensitive Cookie Without 'HttpOnly' Flag

Affects Endress+Hauser MEAC300-FNADE4Source CVE Database V5

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 5.3 Medium.

Data as of 25 Oct 2026, 19:02 UTC

CVSS 3.1 base score

5.3Medium

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 0.4% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 37% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Attack Vector: Network
Attack Complexity: High
Privileges Required: None
User Interaction: Required
Scope: Unchanged
Confidentiality: High
Integrity: None
Availability: None

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable component is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed 'remotely exploitable' and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity: High: A successful attack depends on conditions beyond the attacker's control. That is, a successful attack cannot be accomplished at will, but requires the attacker to invest in some measurable amount of effort in preparation or execution against the vulnerable component before a successful attack can be expected. For example, a successful attack may require an attacker to: gather knowledge about the environment in which the vulnerable target/component exists; prepare the target environment to improve exploit reliability; or inject themselves into the logical network path between the target and the resource requested by the victim in order to read and/or modify network communications (e.g., a man in the middle attack).
Privileges Required: None: The attacker is unauthorized prior to attack, and therefore does not require any access to settings or files to carry out an attack.
User Interaction: Required: Successful exploitation of this vulnerability requires a user to take some action before the vulnerability can be exploited.
Scope: Unchanged: An exploited vulnerability can only affect resources managed by the same security authority. In this case, the vulnerable component and the impacted component are either the same, or both are managed by the same security authority.
Confidentiality: High: There is total loss of confidentiality, resulting in all resources within the impacted component being divulged to the attacker. Alternatively, access to only some restricted information is obtained, but the disclosed information presents a direct, serious impact.
Integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the impacted component.
Availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the impacted component.

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v3.1 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 3 Jul 2025
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 2026-10-25.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
Endress+Hauser Endress+Hauser MEAC300-FNADE4	Affected =0	Fixed in–

AI-suggested

To mitigate this vulnerability, organizations should first verify if their Endress+Hauser MEAC300-FNADE4 devices are running affected versions. Since no official patches are currently available, immediate mitigation steps include: 1) Restricting access to the device's web interface to trusted networks and users only, using network segmentation and firewall rules to limit exposure. 2) Implementing web application firewalls (WAFs) that can detect and block malicious scripts attempting to access cookies. 3) Encouraging users to avoid interacting with suspicious links or content that could trigger malicious scripts. 4) Monitoring device logs and network traffic for unusual access patterns or attempts to exploit session cookies. 5) Contacting Endress+Hauser support for any available firmware updates or security advisories addressing this issue. 6) If feasible, configuring the device or its web server to set the HttpOnly flag on session cookies manually, or applying custom security controls to enforce this behavior. 7) Employing multi-factor authentication (MFA) on management interfaces to reduce the risk of session hijacking leading to unauthorized access.

Description

The HttpOnly flag is set to false on the PHPSESSION cookie. Therefore, the cookie can be accessed by other sources such as JavaScript.

Impact

For European organizations using the Endress+Hauser MEAC300-FNADE4 device, this vulnerability poses a risk primarily to the confidentiality of session information. If exploited, attackers could steal session cookies via malicious scripts, potentially gaining unauthorized access to the device's web interface or management console. This could lead to unauthorized monitoring or manipulation of industrial processes controlled by the device, especially in critical infrastructure sectors such as manufacturing, utilities, or chemical processing. Although the vulnerability does not directly affect integrity or availability, unauthorized access could indirectly lead to operational disruptions or data leakage. The requirement for user interaction and high attack complexity somewhat limits the risk, but targeted spear-phishing or social engineering attacks could facilitate exploitation. Given the industrial nature of the product, the impact on operational technology (OT) environments could be significant if attackers leverage this vulnerability as a foothold for further attacks.

CWE-1004Sensitive Cookie Without 'HttpOnly' Flag (opens in a new tab)
Variant weaknessLikelihood of exploit: MediumOWASP Top 10 A02:2025: Security Misconfiguration (opens in a new tab)
The product uses a cookie to store sensitive information, but the cookie is not marked with the HttpOnly flag.
Implementation
Leverage the HttpOnly flag when setting a sensitive cookie in a response.
OWASP Cheat Sheets
Cross-Site Request Forgery Prevention (opens in a new tab)
Session Management (opens in a new tab)
OWASP ASVS 4.0.3
V3.4.2 (opens in a new tab)
V8.3.8 (opens in a new tab)
V13.4.2 (opens in a new tab)
From MITRE CWE, MITRE CAPEC and OWASP (Top 10, OpenCRE).

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…

Exploitation evidence

What to do

Affected software

Description

AI analysisMachine-generated, updated 3 Jul 2025, 11:58 UTC

WeaknessesCWE-1004

Technical details

References

Community reviews

Related threats