CVE-2025-34116: CWE-78 Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection') in IPFire Project IPFire
A remote command execution vulnerability exists in IPFire before version 2.19 Core Update 101 via the 'proxy.cgi' CGI interface. An authenticated attacker can inject arbitrary shell commands through crafted values in the NCSA user creation form fields, leading to command execution with web server privileges.
AI Analysis
Technical Summary
CVE-2025-34116 is a critical remote command execution vulnerability identified in the IPFire Project's IPFire firewall software, affecting all versions prior to 2.19 Core Update 101. The flaw exists in the 'proxy.cgi' CGI interface, specifically within the NCSA user creation form fields. An authenticated attacker with low privileges can exploit improper neutralization of special elements (CWE-78) by injecting crafted input that is not properly sanitized before being passed to the underlying operating system shell. This leads to arbitrary command execution with the privileges of the web server process. The vulnerability is compounded by additional weaknesses such as improper input validation (CWE-20) and insufficient authentication controls (CWE-306), which facilitate exploitation without requiring user interaction. The CVSS 4.0 base score of 8.7 reflects the high impact and ease of exploitation, with network attack vector, low attack complexity, no user interaction, and privileges required but low in scope. Successful exploitation can allow attackers to execute arbitrary commands, potentially leading to full system compromise, data exfiltration, or disruption of firewall services. No public exploits are currently known in the wild, but the vulnerability's nature and severity make it a high-risk threat for organizations using IPFire as a network security solution.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, the impact of this vulnerability is significant given IPFire's use as a firewall and network security appliance in small to medium enterprises, educational institutions, and some governmental agencies. Exploitation could lead to unauthorized control over network perimeter defenses, enabling attackers to bypass security controls, intercept or manipulate network traffic, and pivot into internal networks. This undermines confidentiality, integrity, and availability of critical systems and data. The compromise of firewall infrastructure can also disrupt business continuity and lead to regulatory non-compliance, especially under GDPR requirements for protecting personal data. Organizations relying on IPFire for perimeter security or VPN services are particularly at risk. The absence of known exploits in the wild suggests a window of opportunity for proactive patching and mitigation before widespread attacks occur.
Mitigation Recommendations
European organizations should immediately upgrade IPFire installations to version 2.19 Core Update 101 or later, where this vulnerability is addressed. In environments where immediate patching is not feasible, organizations should restrict access to the 'proxy.cgi' interface to trusted administrators only, ideally via VPN or management VLANs. Implement strict authentication and monitoring of administrative access to detect anomalous activities. Employ web application firewalls (WAFs) or intrusion prevention systems (IPS) to detect and block suspicious command injection attempts targeting CGI interfaces. Regularly audit and harden firewall configurations to minimize exposure. Additionally, organizations should establish incident response plans specific to firewall compromise scenarios and conduct user training to recognize potential exploitation signs. Continuous vulnerability scanning and penetration testing should include checks for this vulnerability to ensure remediation.
Affected Countries
Germany, France, United Kingdom, Netherlands, Italy, Spain, Poland, Belgium, Sweden, Austria
CVE-2025-34116: CWE-78 Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection') in IPFire Project IPFire
Description
A remote command execution vulnerability exists in IPFire before version 2.19 Core Update 101 via the 'proxy.cgi' CGI interface. An authenticated attacker can inject arbitrary shell commands through crafted values in the NCSA user creation form fields, leading to command execution with web server privileges.
AI-Powered Analysis
Technical Analysis
CVE-2025-34116 is a critical remote command execution vulnerability identified in the IPFire Project's IPFire firewall software, affecting all versions prior to 2.19 Core Update 101. The flaw exists in the 'proxy.cgi' CGI interface, specifically within the NCSA user creation form fields. An authenticated attacker with low privileges can exploit improper neutralization of special elements (CWE-78) by injecting crafted input that is not properly sanitized before being passed to the underlying operating system shell. This leads to arbitrary command execution with the privileges of the web server process. The vulnerability is compounded by additional weaknesses such as improper input validation (CWE-20) and insufficient authentication controls (CWE-306), which facilitate exploitation without requiring user interaction. The CVSS 4.0 base score of 8.7 reflects the high impact and ease of exploitation, with network attack vector, low attack complexity, no user interaction, and privileges required but low in scope. Successful exploitation can allow attackers to execute arbitrary commands, potentially leading to full system compromise, data exfiltration, or disruption of firewall services. No public exploits are currently known in the wild, but the vulnerability's nature and severity make it a high-risk threat for organizations using IPFire as a network security solution.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, the impact of this vulnerability is significant given IPFire's use as a firewall and network security appliance in small to medium enterprises, educational institutions, and some governmental agencies. Exploitation could lead to unauthorized control over network perimeter defenses, enabling attackers to bypass security controls, intercept or manipulate network traffic, and pivot into internal networks. This undermines confidentiality, integrity, and availability of critical systems and data. The compromise of firewall infrastructure can also disrupt business continuity and lead to regulatory non-compliance, especially under GDPR requirements for protecting personal data. Organizations relying on IPFire for perimeter security or VPN services are particularly at risk. The absence of known exploits in the wild suggests a window of opportunity for proactive patching and mitigation before widespread attacks occur.
Mitigation Recommendations
European organizations should immediately upgrade IPFire installations to version 2.19 Core Update 101 or later, where this vulnerability is addressed. In environments where immediate patching is not feasible, organizations should restrict access to the 'proxy.cgi' interface to trusted administrators only, ideally via VPN or management VLANs. Implement strict authentication and monitoring of administrative access to detect anomalous activities. Employ web application firewalls (WAFs) or intrusion prevention systems (IPS) to detect and block suspicious command injection attempts targeting CGI interfaces. Regularly audit and harden firewall configurations to minimize exposure. Additionally, organizations should establish incident response plans specific to firewall compromise scenarios and conduct user training to recognize potential exploitation signs. Continuous vulnerability scanning and penetration testing should include checks for this vulnerability to ensure remediation.
For access to advanced analysis and higher rate limits, contact root@offseq.com
Technical Details
- Data Version
- 5.1
- Assigner Short Name
- VulnCheck
- Date Reserved
- 2025-04-15T19:15:22.560Z
- Cvss Version
- 4.0
- State
- PUBLISHED
Threat ID: 687654a5a83201eaaccea549
Added to database: 7/15/2025, 1:16:21 PM
Last enriched: 7/15/2025, 1:31:08 PM
Last updated: 10/14/2025, 8:22:10 AM
Views: 55
Community Reviews
0 reviewsCrowdsource mitigation strategies, share intel context, and vote on the most helpful responses. Sign in to add your voice and help keep defenders ahead.
Want to contribute mitigation steps or threat intel context? Sign in or create an account to join the community discussion.
Related Threats
CVE-2025-55078: CWE-233 Improper Handling of Parameters in Eclipse Foundation ThreadX
MediumCVE-2025-8594: CWE-918 Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in Pz-LinkCard
UnknownCVE-2025-11731: Access of Resource Using Incompatible Type ('Type Confusion') in Red Hat Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
LowCVE-2025-10357: CWE-79 Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) in Simple SEO
UnknownCVE-2025-10732: CWE-862 Missing Authorization in brainstormforce SureForms – Drag and Drop Contact Form Builder – Multi-step Forms, Conversational Forms and more
MediumActions
Updates to AI analysis require Pro Console access. Upgrade inside Console → Billing.
Need enhanced features?
Contact root@offseq.com for Pro access with improved analysis and higher rate limits.