CVE-2025-34282: CWE-918 Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in ThingsBoard, Inc. ThingsBoard
ThingsBoard versions < 4.2.1 contain a server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in the dashboard's Image Upload Gallery feature. An attacker can upload a malicious SVG file that references a remote URL. If the server processes the SVG file in a way that parses external references, it may initiate unintended outbound requests. This can be used to access internal services or resources.
AI Analysis
Technical Summary
CVE-2025-34282 is a server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability classified under CWE-918, affecting ThingsBoard, an open-source IoT platform used for device management and data visualization. The vulnerability resides in the dashboard's Image Upload Gallery feature in versions prior to 4.2.1. Specifically, the issue arises when an attacker uploads a crafted SVG (Scalable Vector Graphics) file containing external URL references. When the server processes this SVG file, it may parse and fetch these external resources, leading to unintended outbound HTTP requests initiated by the server. This behavior can be exploited to perform SSRF attacks, allowing an attacker to probe internal network services that are otherwise inaccessible externally, potentially leading to information disclosure or further exploitation. The vulnerability requires no authentication or user interaction, increasing its risk profile. The CVSS 4.0 vector (AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:L) indicates network attack vector, low attack complexity, no privileges or user interaction needed, and limited impact on confidentiality and integrity, with no impact on availability. No public exploits have been reported yet, but the vulnerability's nature makes it a candidate for future exploitation, especially in environments where ThingsBoard is deployed to manage critical IoT infrastructure. The lack of patch links suggests that users should upgrade to ThingsBoard version 4.2.1 or later, where this issue is resolved.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, especially those involved in industrial automation, smart city infrastructure, or IoT device management using ThingsBoard, this SSRF vulnerability poses a significant risk. Exploitation could allow attackers to bypass perimeter defenses and access internal services, potentially leading to unauthorized data access, internal network reconnaissance, or pivoting to more critical systems. This could compromise sensitive operational data or disrupt IoT device management. Given the increasing adoption of IoT platforms in Europe, the vulnerability could affect sectors such as manufacturing, energy, transportation, and utilities. The medium severity rating reflects a moderate but tangible risk, particularly in environments where internal network segmentation is weak or where sensitive services are exposed internally. The absence of authentication requirements lowers the barrier for exploitation, increasing the urgency for mitigation. However, the lack of known exploits in the wild currently reduces immediate risk, though this may change as threat actors develop attack tools targeting this flaw.
Mitigation Recommendations
European organizations should immediately verify their ThingsBoard versions and upgrade to version 4.2.1 or later, where the SSRF vulnerability is patched. If upgrading is not immediately feasible, organizations should implement strict input validation and sanitization on uploaded SVG files, specifically disallowing or stripping external references within SVG content. Network-level controls should be enforced to restrict outbound HTTP requests from the ThingsBoard server, limiting them to only necessary destinations. Internal network segmentation should be strengthened to minimize the impact of any SSRF exploitation by isolating critical internal services from the ThingsBoard server's network zone. Monitoring and logging of outbound requests from ThingsBoard servers should be enhanced to detect anomalous or unexpected traffic patterns indicative of SSRF exploitation attempts. Additionally, organizations should review and harden firewall rules and proxy configurations to prevent unauthorized external resource fetching. Security teams should stay alert for any emerging exploit reports or indicators of compromise related to this vulnerability.
Affected Countries
Germany, France, United Kingdom, Italy, Netherlands, Spain, Sweden
CVE-2025-34282: CWE-918 Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in ThingsBoard, Inc. ThingsBoard
Description
ThingsBoard versions < 4.2.1 contain a server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in the dashboard's Image Upload Gallery feature. An attacker can upload a malicious SVG file that references a remote URL. If the server processes the SVG file in a way that parses external references, it may initiate unintended outbound requests. This can be used to access internal services or resources.
AI-Powered Analysis
Technical Analysis
CVE-2025-34282 is a server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability classified under CWE-918, affecting ThingsBoard, an open-source IoT platform used for device management and data visualization. The vulnerability resides in the dashboard's Image Upload Gallery feature in versions prior to 4.2.1. Specifically, the issue arises when an attacker uploads a crafted SVG (Scalable Vector Graphics) file containing external URL references. When the server processes this SVG file, it may parse and fetch these external resources, leading to unintended outbound HTTP requests initiated by the server. This behavior can be exploited to perform SSRF attacks, allowing an attacker to probe internal network services that are otherwise inaccessible externally, potentially leading to information disclosure or further exploitation. The vulnerability requires no authentication or user interaction, increasing its risk profile. The CVSS 4.0 vector (AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:L) indicates network attack vector, low attack complexity, no privileges or user interaction needed, and limited impact on confidentiality and integrity, with no impact on availability. No public exploits have been reported yet, but the vulnerability's nature makes it a candidate for future exploitation, especially in environments where ThingsBoard is deployed to manage critical IoT infrastructure. The lack of patch links suggests that users should upgrade to ThingsBoard version 4.2.1 or later, where this issue is resolved.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, especially those involved in industrial automation, smart city infrastructure, or IoT device management using ThingsBoard, this SSRF vulnerability poses a significant risk. Exploitation could allow attackers to bypass perimeter defenses and access internal services, potentially leading to unauthorized data access, internal network reconnaissance, or pivoting to more critical systems. This could compromise sensitive operational data or disrupt IoT device management. Given the increasing adoption of IoT platforms in Europe, the vulnerability could affect sectors such as manufacturing, energy, transportation, and utilities. The medium severity rating reflects a moderate but tangible risk, particularly in environments where internal network segmentation is weak or where sensitive services are exposed internally. The absence of authentication requirements lowers the barrier for exploitation, increasing the urgency for mitigation. However, the lack of known exploits in the wild currently reduces immediate risk, though this may change as threat actors develop attack tools targeting this flaw.
Mitigation Recommendations
European organizations should immediately verify their ThingsBoard versions and upgrade to version 4.2.1 or later, where the SSRF vulnerability is patched. If upgrading is not immediately feasible, organizations should implement strict input validation and sanitization on uploaded SVG files, specifically disallowing or stripping external references within SVG content. Network-level controls should be enforced to restrict outbound HTTP requests from the ThingsBoard server, limiting them to only necessary destinations. Internal network segmentation should be strengthened to minimize the impact of any SSRF exploitation by isolating critical internal services from the ThingsBoard server's network zone. Monitoring and logging of outbound requests from ThingsBoard servers should be enhanced to detect anomalous or unexpected traffic patterns indicative of SSRF exploitation attempts. Additionally, organizations should review and harden firewall rules and proxy configurations to prevent unauthorized external resource fetching. Security teams should stay alert for any emerging exploit reports or indicators of compromise related to this vulnerability.
Affected Countries
For access to advanced analysis and higher rate limits, contact root@offseq.com
Technical Details
- Data Version
- 5.1
- Assigner Short Name
- VulnCheck
- Date Reserved
- 2025-04-15T19:15:22.581Z
- Cvss Version
- 4.0
- State
- PUBLISHED
Threat ID: 68f28f159c34d0947f3bb428
Added to database: 10/17/2025, 6:46:45 PM
Last enriched: 11/19/2025, 4:11:09 AM
Last updated: 12/4/2025, 3:41:32 AM
Views: 104
Community Reviews
0 reviewsCrowdsource mitigation strategies, share intel context, and vote on the most helpful responses. Sign in to add your voice and help keep defenders ahead.
Want to contribute mitigation steps or threat intel context? Sign in or create an account to join the community discussion.
Related Threats
Nation-State Attack or Compromised Government? [Guest Diary], (Thu, Dec 4th)
MediumCVE-2025-62173: CWE-89: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') in FreePBX security-reporting
HighCVE-2025-64055: n/a
UnknownCVE-2025-66404: CWE-77: Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in a Command ('Command Injection') in Flux159 mcp-server-kubernetes
MediumCVE-2025-66293: CWE-125: Out-of-bounds Read in pnggroup libpng
HighActions
Updates to AI analysis require Pro Console access. Upgrade inside Console → Billing.
Need enhanced features?
Contact root@offseq.com for Pro access with improved analysis and higher rate limits.