CVE-2025-37879: Vulnerability in Linux Linux
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: 9p/net: fix improper handling of bogus negative read/write replies In p9_client_write() and p9_client_read_once(), if the server incorrectly replies with success but a negative write/read count then we would consider written (negative) <= rsize (positive) because both variables were signed. Make variables unsigned to avoid this problem. The reproducer linked below now fails with the following error instead of a null pointer deref: 9pnet: bogus RWRITE count (4294967295 > 3)
AI Analysis
Technical Summary
CVE-2025-37879 is a vulnerability identified in the Linux kernel's 9p network filesystem client implementation, specifically within the functions p9_client_write() and p9_client_read_once(). The vulnerability arises from improper handling of server responses that contain bogus negative read or write counts. In the affected code, these counts were treated as signed integers, which led to incorrect comparisons when the server replied with a negative value but indicated success. This flaw could cause the client to misinterpret the amount of data read or written, potentially leading to undefined behavior such as null pointer dereferences or other memory corruption issues. The root cause was the use of signed variables for read/write counts, which should have been unsigned to correctly handle such edge cases. The patch involves changing these variables to unsigned types, preventing the erroneous acceptance of negative counts and thereby mitigating the risk of memory corruption. While no known exploits are currently reported in the wild, the vulnerability could be leveraged by a malicious or compromised 9p server to disrupt client operations or potentially execute arbitrary code due to memory corruption. The 9p protocol is often used in virtualized environments (such as QEMU/KVM) for sharing filesystems between host and guest, so the vulnerability is particularly relevant in cloud and virtualization contexts.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, the impact of CVE-2025-37879 could be significant, especially for those relying on Linux-based virtualized environments or cloud infrastructures that utilize the 9p filesystem protocol for host-guest communication. Exploitation could lead to denial of service via kernel crashes or potentially privilege escalation if memory corruption is leveraged for code execution. This could disrupt critical services, data processing, or cloud workloads. Confidentiality and integrity of data could be compromised if attackers gain kernel-level access. Given the widespread use of Linux in European public sector, financial institutions, and technology companies, the vulnerability poses a risk to operational continuity and data security. However, the absence of known exploits and the requirement for a malicious or compromised 9p server to trigger the issue somewhat limits the immediate threat. Nonetheless, organizations using virtualization platforms that expose 9p shares should consider this vulnerability a priority for patching to prevent future exploitation.
Mitigation Recommendations
European organizations should take the following specific mitigation steps: 1) Identify all Linux systems running kernels with the affected 9p client code, especially those used in virtualization or cloud environments. 2) Apply the official Linux kernel patches that convert the read/write count variables to unsigned types as soon as they are available from trusted Linux distributions or kernel maintainers. 3) Restrict and monitor access to 9p servers, ensuring only trusted hosts can provide 9p shares to clients, reducing the risk of malicious server responses. 4) Implement network segmentation and firewall rules to limit exposure of 9p services to untrusted networks. 5) Employ kernel hardening and runtime protections such as Kernel Address Space Layout Randomization (KASLR) and Control Flow Integrity (CFI) to mitigate exploitation impact. 6) Monitor system logs and kernel messages for anomalies related to 9p client operations that could indicate attempted exploitation. 7) For environments where patching is delayed, consider disabling 9p filesystem usage temporarily if feasible, or using alternative file sharing mechanisms.
Affected Countries
Germany, France, United Kingdom, Netherlands, Sweden, Finland, Italy, Spain
CVE-2025-37879: Vulnerability in Linux Linux
Description
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: 9p/net: fix improper handling of bogus negative read/write replies In p9_client_write() and p9_client_read_once(), if the server incorrectly replies with success but a negative write/read count then we would consider written (negative) <= rsize (positive) because both variables were signed. Make variables unsigned to avoid this problem. The reproducer linked below now fails with the following error instead of a null pointer deref: 9pnet: bogus RWRITE count (4294967295 > 3)
AI-Powered Analysis
Technical Analysis
CVE-2025-37879 is a vulnerability identified in the Linux kernel's 9p network filesystem client implementation, specifically within the functions p9_client_write() and p9_client_read_once(). The vulnerability arises from improper handling of server responses that contain bogus negative read or write counts. In the affected code, these counts were treated as signed integers, which led to incorrect comparisons when the server replied with a negative value but indicated success. This flaw could cause the client to misinterpret the amount of data read or written, potentially leading to undefined behavior such as null pointer dereferences or other memory corruption issues. The root cause was the use of signed variables for read/write counts, which should have been unsigned to correctly handle such edge cases. The patch involves changing these variables to unsigned types, preventing the erroneous acceptance of negative counts and thereby mitigating the risk of memory corruption. While no known exploits are currently reported in the wild, the vulnerability could be leveraged by a malicious or compromised 9p server to disrupt client operations or potentially execute arbitrary code due to memory corruption. The 9p protocol is often used in virtualized environments (such as QEMU/KVM) for sharing filesystems between host and guest, so the vulnerability is particularly relevant in cloud and virtualization contexts.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, the impact of CVE-2025-37879 could be significant, especially for those relying on Linux-based virtualized environments or cloud infrastructures that utilize the 9p filesystem protocol for host-guest communication. Exploitation could lead to denial of service via kernel crashes or potentially privilege escalation if memory corruption is leveraged for code execution. This could disrupt critical services, data processing, or cloud workloads. Confidentiality and integrity of data could be compromised if attackers gain kernel-level access. Given the widespread use of Linux in European public sector, financial institutions, and technology companies, the vulnerability poses a risk to operational continuity and data security. However, the absence of known exploits and the requirement for a malicious or compromised 9p server to trigger the issue somewhat limits the immediate threat. Nonetheless, organizations using virtualization platforms that expose 9p shares should consider this vulnerability a priority for patching to prevent future exploitation.
Mitigation Recommendations
European organizations should take the following specific mitigation steps: 1) Identify all Linux systems running kernels with the affected 9p client code, especially those used in virtualization or cloud environments. 2) Apply the official Linux kernel patches that convert the read/write count variables to unsigned types as soon as they are available from trusted Linux distributions or kernel maintainers. 3) Restrict and monitor access to 9p servers, ensuring only trusted hosts can provide 9p shares to clients, reducing the risk of malicious server responses. 4) Implement network segmentation and firewall rules to limit exposure of 9p services to untrusted networks. 5) Employ kernel hardening and runtime protections such as Kernel Address Space Layout Randomization (KASLR) and Control Flow Integrity (CFI) to mitigate exploitation impact. 6) Monitor system logs and kernel messages for anomalies related to 9p client operations that could indicate attempted exploitation. 7) For environments where patching is delayed, consider disabling 9p filesystem usage temporarily if feasible, or using alternative file sharing mechanisms.
Affected Countries
For access to advanced analysis and higher rate limits, contact root@offseq.com
Technical Details
- Data Version
- 5.1
- Assigner Short Name
- Linux
- Date Reserved
- 2025-04-16T04:51:23.962Z
- Cisa Enriched
- false
- Cvss Version
- null
- State
- PUBLISHED
Threat ID: 682d9818c4522896dcbd7bc6
Added to database: 5/21/2025, 9:08:40 AM
Last enriched: 7/4/2025, 12:57:20 AM
Last updated: 8/14/2025, 2:52:20 AM
Views: 13
Related Threats
CVE-2025-8719: CWE-79 Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') in reubenthiessen Translate This gTranslate Shortcode
MediumCVE-2025-8464: CWE-23 Relative Path Traversal in glenwpcoder Drag and Drop Multiple File Upload for Contact Form 7
MediumCVE-2025-7499: CWE-862 Missing Authorization in wpdevteam BetterDocs – Advanced AI-Driven Documentation, FAQ & Knowledge Base Tool for Elementor & Gutenberg with Encyclopedia, AI Support, Instant Answers
MediumCVE-2025-8898: CWE-862 Missing Authorization in magepeopleteam E-cab Taxi Booking Manager for Woocommerce
CriticalCVE-2025-8896: CWE-79 Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') in cozmoslabs User Profile Builder – Beautiful User Registration Forms, User Profiles & User Role Editor
MediumActions
Updates to AI analysis are available only with a Pro account. Contact root@offseq.com for access.
Need enhanced features?
Contact root@offseq.com for Pro access with improved analysis and higher rate limits.