VulnerabilityPublished 9 Sep 2025Updated 12 Sep 2025

CVE-2025-54083: Calix GigaCenter ONT · Insecure Storage of Sensitive Information

Affects Calix GigaCenter ONTSource CVE Database V5

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 5.1 Medium.

Data as of 26 Oct 2026, 12:29 UTC

CVSS 4.0 base score

5.1Medium

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 0.2% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 10% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.

CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Attack Vector: Physical
Attack Complexity: Low
Attack Requirements: None
Privileges Required: None
User Interaction: None
Vulnerable system confidentiality: High
Vulnerable system integrity: None
Vulnerable system availability: None
Subsequent system confidentiality: None
Subsequent system integrity: None
Subsequent system availability: None

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Physical: The attack requires the attacker to physically touch or manipulate the vulnerable system. Physical interaction may be brief (e.g., evil maid attack) or persistent.
Attack Complexity: Low: The attacker must take no measurable action to exploit the vulnerability. The attack requires no target-specific circumvention to exploit the vulnerability. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable system.
Attack Requirements: None: The successful attack does not depend on the deployment and execution conditions of the vulnerable system. The attacker can expect to be able to reach the vulnerability and execute the exploit under all or most instances of the vulnerability.
Privileges Required: None: The attacker is unauthorized prior to attack, and therefore does not require any access to settings or files of the vulnerable system to carry out an attack.
User Interaction: None: The vulnerable system can be exploited without interaction from any human user, other than the attacker.
Vulnerable system confidentiality: High: There is a total loss of confidentiality, resulting in all information within the Vulnerable System being divulged to the attacker. Alternatively, access to only some restricted information is obtained, but the disclosed information presents a direct, serious impact. For example, an attacker steals the administrator's password, or private encryption keys of a web server.
Vulnerable system integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system confidentiality: None: There is no loss of confidentiality within the Subsequent System or all confidentiality impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the Subsequent System or all integrity impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the Subsequent System or all availability impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v4.0 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 9 Sep 2025
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 26 Oct 2026.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC or the CVSS exploit maturity reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

AI-suggested

Physical Security: Strengthen physical security controls around ONT devices to prevent unauthorized physical access. This includes secure installation locations and tamper-evident seals.
Network Segmentation: Isolate ONT management interfaces on separate VLANs or management networks inaccessible from general user networks to limit exposure.
Access Controls: Implement strict access control policies and monitor access logs for suspicious activity related to ONT devices.
Firmware Updates: Regularly check with Calix for firmware updates or patches addressing this vulnerability and apply them promptly once available.
Device Replacement: For high-risk environments, consider replacing affected ONT models with devices not impacted by this vulnerability.
Monitoring and Detection: Deploy network monitoring to detect unusual traffic patterns or unauthorized access attempts to ONT management interfaces.
Vendor Engagement: Engage with Calix support to obtain guidance and timelines for remediation and to report any suspicious activity.

Description

Insecure Storage of Sensitive Information vulnerability in Calix GigaCenter ONT (Quantenna SoC modules) allows admin access to the web interface.This issue affects GigaCenter ONT: 844E, 844G, 844GE, 854GE.

Impact

For European organizations, this vulnerability poses a significant risk especially for Internet Service Providers (ISPs), telecommunications companies, and enterprises deploying Calix GigaCenter ONT devices for fiber broadband access. Compromise of ONT devices can lead to unauthorized network access, interception of sensitive data, and potential disruption of internet services for end-users. Given the critical role of ONTs in last-mile connectivity, exploitation could affect confidentiality and availability of network services. This is particularly concerning for sectors relying on secure and stable internet connectivity such as finance, healthcare, and government services. Additionally, the exposure of administrative interfaces could facilitate lateral movement within networks or be leveraged for further attacks. The physical access requirement somewhat limits remote exploitation, but insider threats or attackers with physical proximity could exploit this vulnerability. The lack of patches increases the urgency for organizations to implement compensating controls to prevent exploitation.

CWE-922Insecure Storage of Sensitive Information (opens in a new tab)
Class weaknessOWASP Top 10 A01:2025: Broken Access Control (opens in a new tab)
The product stores sensitive information without properly limiting read or write access by unauthorized actors.
OWASP Cheat Sheets
Authorization (opens in a new tab)
OWASP ASVS 4.0.3
V8.1.6 (opens in a new tab)
V8.2.3 (opens in a new tab)
V8.2.2 (opens in a new tab)
From MITRE CWE, MITRE CAPEC and OWASP (Top 10, OpenCRE).

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…

Exploitation evidence

What to do

Description

AI analysisMachine-generated, updated 17 Sep 2025, 00:42 UTC

WeaknessesCWE-922

Technical details

References

Community reviews

Related threats