Skip to main content

CVE-2025-54368: CWE-436: Interpretation Conflict in astral-sh uv

Medium
VulnerabilityCVE-2025-54368cvecve-2025-54368cwe-436cwe-20
Published: Fri Aug 08 2025 (08/08/2025, 00:00:39 UTC)
Source: CVE Database V5
Vendor/Project: astral-sh
Product: uv

Description

uv is a Python package and project manager written in Rust. In versions 0.8.5 and earlier, remote ZIP archives were handled in a streamwise fashion, and file entries were not reconciled against the archive's central directory. An attacker could contrive a ZIP archive that would extract with legitimate contents on some package installers, and malicious contents on others due to multiple local file entries. An attacker could also contrive a "stacked" ZIP input with multiple internal ZIPs, which would be handled differently by different package installers. The attacker could choose which installer to target in both scenarios. This issue is fixed in version 0.8.6. To work around this issue, users may choose to set UV_INSECURE_NO_ZIP_VALIDATION=1 to revert to the previous behavior.

AI-Powered Analysis

AILast updated: 08/08/2025, 00:17:46 UTC

Technical Analysis

CVE-2025-54368 is a medium-severity vulnerability affecting the 'uv' Python package and project manager, which is implemented in Rust. Versions prior to 0.8.6 handle remote ZIP archives in a streamwise manner without reconciling file entries against the archive's central directory. This leads to an interpretation conflict where an attacker can craft malicious ZIP archives containing multiple local file entries or "stacked" ZIP inputs with multiple internal ZIPs. Different package installers process these archives inconsistently, resulting in some installers extracting legitimate contents while others extract malicious payloads. This discrepancy enables an attacker to selectively target specific installers by exploiting how they parse ZIP archives. The vulnerability arises from CWE-436 (Interpretation Conflict) and CWE-20 (Improper Input Validation), indicating that the root cause is inconsistent interpretation of archive contents and insufficient validation of input data. The vulnerability does not require privileges or authentication but does require user interaction to trigger extraction. The CVSS 4.0 base score is 6.8 (medium), reflecting local attack vector, low attack complexity, no privileges required, user interaction needed, and high impact on integrity. No known exploits are currently in the wild. The issue is fixed in version 0.8.6 of 'uv'. Users can temporarily revert to the previous behavior by setting the environment variable UV_INSECURE_NO_ZIP_VALIDATION=1, though this is not recommended as a long-term solution. This vulnerability primarily affects environments where 'uv' is used to manage Python packages, especially when installing packages from remote ZIP archives. The inconsistent extraction behavior could lead to supply chain compromise, allowing attackers to inject malicious code selectively depending on the package installer used.

Potential Impact

For European organizations, this vulnerability poses a moderate risk primarily in software development, DevOps, and continuous integration/continuous deployment (CI/CD) pipelines that utilize the 'uv' tool for Python package management. The ability to craft ZIP archives that extract malicious payloads selectively can lead to supply chain attacks, potentially compromising code integrity and introducing backdoors or malware into production environments. This could result in data breaches, unauthorized access, or disruption of services. Organizations relying on automated package installations or using multiple package installers that handle ZIP archives differently are at higher risk. The impact is particularly significant for sectors with stringent compliance requirements such as finance, healthcare, and critical infrastructure, where integrity and trustworthiness of software components are paramount. However, since exploitation requires user interaction and local access, the threat is somewhat mitigated in highly controlled environments. The absence of known exploits in the wild reduces immediate risk but does not eliminate the need for proactive mitigation.

Mitigation Recommendations

European organizations should immediately upgrade the 'uv' package to version 0.8.6 or later to eliminate the vulnerability. For environments where immediate upgrade is not feasible, avoid using the UV_INSECURE_NO_ZIP_VALIDATION=1 workaround as it reverts to insecure behavior. Implement strict validation and verification of all third-party packages and ZIP archives before installation, including cryptographic signature verification where possible. Employ multiple layers of defense such as endpoint protection, application whitelisting, and runtime monitoring to detect anomalous behavior resulting from malicious package extraction. Incorporate supply chain security best practices, including using trusted package repositories and reproducible builds. Educate developers and DevOps teams about the risks of ZIP archive manipulation and encourage cautious handling of packages from untrusted sources. Regularly audit CI/CD pipelines and package management tools for outdated dependencies and vulnerabilities. Finally, monitor security advisories related to 'uv' and related tooling to stay informed about emerging threats or patches.

Need more detailed analysis?Get Pro

Technical Details

Data Version
5.1
Assigner Short Name
GitHub_M
Date Reserved
2025-07-21T16:12:20.732Z
Cvss Version
4.0
State
PUBLISHED

Threat ID: 68953ea5ad5a09ad00fe06ec

Added to database: 8/8/2025, 12:02:45 AM

Last enriched: 8/8/2025, 12:17:46 AM

Last updated: 8/8/2025, 4:50:46 AM

Views: 5

Actions

PRO

Updates to AI analysis are available only with a Pro account. Contact root@offseq.com for access.

Please log in to the Console to use AI analysis features.

Need enhanced features?

Contact root@offseq.com for Pro access with improved analysis and higher rate limits.

Latest Threats