CVE-2025-58272VulnerabilityPublished 3 Sep 2025

CVE-2025-58272: NTT EAST Web Caster V130 · Cross-site request forgery (CSRF)

Affects NTT EAST Web Caster V130Source CVE Database V5

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 3.7 Low.

Data as of 25 Oct 2026, 19:02 UTC

CVSS 3.0 base score

3.7Low

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 0.1% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 2% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.

CVSS:3.0/AV:A/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L

Attack Vector: Adjacent
Attack Complexity: High
Privileges Required: None
User Interaction: Required
Scope: Unchanged
Confidentiality: None
Integrity: Low
Availability: Low

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Adjacent: The vulnerable component is bound to the network stack, but the attack is limited at the protocol level to a logically adjacent topology. This can mean an attack must be launched from the same shared physical (e.g., Bluetooth or IEEE 802.11) or logical (e.g., local IP subnet) network, or from within a secure or otherwise limited administrative domain (e.g., MPLS, secure VPN to an administrative network zone).
Attack Complexity: High: A successful attack depends on conditions beyond the attacker's control. That is, a successful attack cannot be accomplished at will, but requires the attacker to invest in some measurable amount of effort in preparation or execution against the vulnerable component before a successful attack can be expected. For example, a successful attack may require an attacker to: gather knowledge about the environment in which the vulnerable target/component exists; prepare the target environment to improve exploit reliability; or inject themselves into the logical network path between the target and the resource requested by the victim in order to read and/or modify network communications (e.g., a man in the middle attack).
Privileges Required: None: The attacker is unauthorized prior to attack, and therefore does not require any access to settings or files to carry out an attack.
User Interaction: Required: Successful exploitation of this vulnerability requires a user to take some action before the vulnerability can be exploited.
Scope: Unchanged: An exploited vulnerability can only affect resources managed by the same security authority. In this case, the vulnerable component and the impacted component are either the same, or both are managed by the same security authority.
Confidentiality: None: There is no loss of confidentiality within the impacted component.
Integrity: Low: Modification of data is possible, but the attacker does not have control over the consequence of a modification, or the amount of modification is limited. The data modification does not have a direct, serious impact on the impacted component.
Availability: Low: Performance is reduced or there are interruptions in resource availability. Even if repeated exploitation of the vulnerability is possible, the attacker does not have the ability to completely deny service to legitimate users. The resources in the impacted component are either partially available all of the time, or fully available only some of the time, but overall there is no direct, serious consequence to the impacted component.

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v3.1 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 3 Sep 2025
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 2026-10-25.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
NTT EAST, Inc. Web Caster V130	Affected <=1.08	Fixed in–

AI-suggested

To mitigate this vulnerability, European organizations should first identify any deployments of NTT EAST Web Caster V130 devices running version 1.08 or earlier. In the interim, network segmentation should be enforced to isolate management interfaces from untrusted networks and restrict access to authorized personnel only. Implementing web filtering to block access to known malicious sites can reduce the risk of users visiting attacker-controlled pages. Educating users about the risks of clicking unknown links or visiting suspicious websites is critical. Additionally, enabling multi-factor authentication (if supported) and monitoring device logs for unauthorized configuration changes can help detect exploitation attempts. Network administrators should consider disabling remote management interfaces or restricting them to trusted IP addresses. Regularly auditing device configurations and maintaining an inventory of network devices will improve response readiness. Finally, deploying web application firewalls or intrusion detection systems that can detect CSRF attack patterns may provide additional protection.

Description

Cross-site request forgery vulnerability exists in Web Caster V130 versions 1.08 and earlier. If a logged-in user views a malicious page created by an attacker, the settings of the product may be unintentionally changed.

Impact

For European organizations, the impact of this vulnerability depends on the deployment of NTT EAST Web Caster V130 devices within their network infrastructure. If used, the vulnerability could allow attackers on the same local network segment to manipulate device settings by tricking authorized users into visiting malicious web pages. This could lead to network disruptions, degraded device functionality, or unauthorized changes that may weaken network security posture. Although the confidentiality impact is none, integrity and availability impacts could affect business operations relying on stable network connectivity. The requirement for user interaction and local network access limits remote exploitation risks, but insider threats or compromised internal systems could leverage this vulnerability. Organizations with remote or hybrid workforces using such devices in home or branch office environments may face increased risk due to less controlled network environments. Overall, the threat is moderate for European organizations but should not be ignored, especially in sectors where network reliability and device integrity are critical, such as telecommunications, finance, and critical infrastructure.

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…