CVE-2025-62155VulnerabilityPublished 24 Nov 2025

CVE-2025-62155: QuantumNous new-api · Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)

Affects QuantumNous new-apiSource CVE Database V5

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 8.5 High : upgrade to 0.9.6 soon.

Data as of 26 Oct 2026, 07:57 UTC

CVSS 3.1 base score

8.5High

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 0.2% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 22% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.
Patch: Available – fixed in 0.9.6

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N

Attack Vector: Network
Attack Complexity: Low
Privileges Required: Low
User Interaction: None
Scope: Changed
Confidentiality: High
Integrity: Low
Availability: None

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable component is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed 'remotely exploitable' and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity: Low: Specialized access conditions or extenuating circumstances do not exist. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable component.
Privileges Required: Low: The attacker is authorized with (i.e., requires) privileges that provide basic user capabilities that could normally affect only settings and files owned by a user. Alternatively, an attacker with Low privileges may have the ability to cause an impact only to non-sensitive resources.
User Interaction: None: The vulnerable system can be exploited without any interaction from any user.
Scope: Changed: An exploited vulnerability can affect resources beyond the security scope managed by the security authority of the vulnerable component. In this case, the vulnerable component and the impacted component are different and managed by different security authorities.
Confidentiality: High: There is total loss of confidentiality, resulting in all resources within the impacted component being divulged to the attacker. Alternatively, access to only some restricted information is obtained, but the disclosed information presents a direct, serious impact.
Integrity: Low: Modification of data is possible, but the attacker does not have control over the consequence of a modification, or the amount of modification is limited. The data modification does not have a direct, serious impact on the impacted component.
Availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the impacted component.

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v3.1 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 24 Nov 2025
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 2026-10-26.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Upgrade quantumnous/new-api to 0.9.6.

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
GitHubquantumnous/new-api`pkg:github/quantumnous/new-api`Other threats	Affected <0.9.6	Fixed in 0.9.6

Check your own hosts for these packages with threat-finder (opens in a new tab), our free open-source scanner.

AI-suggested

1. Immediately upgrade QuantumNous new-api to version 0.9.6 or later, which contains the patch addressing the SSRF bypass via HTTP redirects. 2. Implement strict network segmentation and firewall rules to limit the new-api server’s ability to make outbound requests to sensitive internal resources. 3. Deploy web application firewalls (WAFs) with custom rules to detect and block suspicious SSRF patterns, including unusual redirect chains. 4. Monitor logs for unexpected outbound HTTP requests and 302 redirect responses from the new-api server to identify potential exploitation attempts. 5. Conduct regular security assessments and penetration testing focusing on SSRF vectors and redirect handling in the new-api environment. 6. Educate development and security teams on the risks of incomplete SSRF mitigations, emphasizing validation of all redirect targets. 7. Where possible, disable or restrict HTTP redirects in the new-api configuration to reduce attack surface. 8. Employ network-level egress filtering to prevent unauthorized internal resource access even if SSRF is attempted. These measures combined will reduce the risk of exploitation and limit potential damage.

Description

New API is a large language mode (LLM) gateway and artificial intelligence (AI) asset management system. Prior to version 0.9.6, a recently patched SSRF vulnerability contains a bypass method that can bypass the existing security fix and still allow SSRF to occur. Because the existing fix only applies security restrictions to the first URL request, a 302 redirect can bypass existing security measures and successfully access the intranet. This issue has been patched in version 0.9.6.

Impact

For European organizations, this SSRF vulnerability poses a significant risk to the confidentiality of internal network resources, including sensitive AI asset management data and potentially other intranet services. Exploitation could lead to unauthorized access to internal systems, data leakage, and reconnaissance that may facilitate further attacks. Given the increasing adoption of AI and LLM technologies in Europe, organizations relying on QuantumNous new-api could face targeted attacks aiming to exploit this flaw. Critical sectors such as finance, healthcare, and government agencies using this product may experience increased risk of data breaches. The vulnerability’s ability to bypass existing security controls via HTTP redirects complicates detection and mitigation. Additionally, the low privilege requirement and remote exploitability increase the likelihood of exploitation attempts. Although no active exploits are currently known, the vulnerability’s characteristics make it a high-priority threat that could be leveraged in multi-stage attacks against European infrastructure.

CWE-918Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) (opens in a new tab)
Base weaknessCWE Top 25 (2025): #22OWASP Top 10 A01:2025: Broken Access Control (opens in a new tab)
The web server receives a URL or similar request from an upstream component and retrieves the contents of this URL, but it does not sufficiently ensure that the request is being sent to the expected destination.
OWASP Cheat Sheets
Server Side Request Forgery Prevention (opens in a new tab)
Unvalidated Redirects and Forwards (opens in a new tab)
Cross Site Scripting Prevention (opens in a new tab)
DOM based XSS Prevention (opens in a new tab)
Authorization (opens in a new tab)
OWASP ASVS 4.0.3
V12.6.1 (opens in a new tab)
V5.2.6 (opens in a new tab)
Attack patterns
Server Side Request Forgery (opens in a new tab)
From MITRE CWE, MITRE CAPEC and OWASP (Top 10, OpenCRE).

References

github.com/QuantumNous/new-api/security/advisories/GHSA-9f46-w24h-69w4 (opens in a new tab)

Community reviews

Loading reviews…

Exploitation evidence

What to do

Affected software

Description

AI analysisMachine-generated, updated 2 Dec 2025, 00:30 UTC

WeaknessesCWE-918

Technical details

References

Community reviews

Related threats