CVE-2025-65563: n/a
A denial-of-service vulnerability exists in the omec-project UPF (component upf-epc/pfcpiface) up to at least version upf-epc-pfcpiface:2.1.3-dev. When the UPF receives a PFCP Association Setup Request that is missing the mandatory NodeID Information Element, the association setup handler dereferences a nil pointer instead of validating the message, causing a panic and terminating the UPF process. An attacker who can send PFCP Association Setup Request messages to the UPF's N4/PFCP endpoint can exploit this issue to repeatedly crash the UPF and disrupt user-plane services.
AI Analysis
Technical Summary
CVE-2025-65563 identifies a denial-of-service vulnerability in the open-source omec-project User Plane Function (UPF) component, specifically in the upf-epc/pfcpiface module up to version 2.1.3-dev. The vulnerability arises from improper input validation in the PFCP Association Setup Request handler. When the UPF receives a PFCP Association Setup Request message that lacks the mandatory NodeID Information Element, the handler dereferences a nil pointer instead of validating the message structure. This causes a runtime panic and terminates the UPF process, effectively crashing the user plane function. The PFCP protocol is used between the Control Plane and User Plane in 5G core networks, with the N4 interface being critical for session management and forwarding rules. An attacker capable of sending crafted PFCP messages to the UPF's N4/PFCP endpoint can exploit this flaw remotely without authentication or user interaction. The impact is a denial-of-service condition that disrupts user-plane traffic forwarding, potentially causing service outages or degraded network performance. The vulnerability is tracked as CWE-476 (NULL Pointer Dereference). Although no public exploits are reported yet, the CVSS v3.1 score of 7.5 (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H) indicates a high severity due to network attack vector, low complexity, no privileges or user interaction required, and high impact on availability. No patches are currently linked, so operators must monitor for updates or implement input validation workarounds. This vulnerability highlights the importance of robust protocol message validation in telecom software components.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, particularly telecom operators and 5G network providers using the omec-project UPF, this vulnerability poses a significant risk to network availability. Exploitation can cause repeated crashes of the UPF, disrupting user-plane services that handle data traffic for mobile subscribers. This can lead to degraded service quality, dropped connections, and potential revenue loss. Critical infrastructure relying on 5G connectivity, including emergency services, IoT deployments, and enterprise communications, may experience interruptions. The lack of confidentiality or integrity impact limits data breach risks, but availability degradation in telecom core components can have cascading effects on dependent services. The vulnerability could also be leveraged in larger distributed denial-of-service (DDoS) campaigns targeting telecom infrastructure. European regulators and network operators must prioritize mitigation to maintain service continuity and comply with network resilience requirements.
Mitigation Recommendations
1. Implement strict validation of PFCP Association Setup Request messages at the UPF N4 interface to ensure mandatory Information Elements like NodeID are present before processing. 2. Apply patches or updates from the omec-project as soon as they become available addressing this nil pointer dereference issue. 3. Deploy network-level filtering or rate limiting on the N4/PFCP interface to restrict or monitor incoming PFCP messages from unauthorized or suspicious sources. 4. Use anomaly detection systems to identify unusual PFCP traffic patterns indicative of exploitation attempts. 5. Conduct regular security audits and fuzz testing on protocol handlers to uncover similar input validation flaws. 6. Collaborate with vendors and open-source communities to accelerate patch development and share threat intelligence. 7. Prepare incident response plans for UPF service disruptions to minimize downtime and impact on end users. 8. Consider redundancy and failover mechanisms in UPF deployments to maintain user-plane availability during attacks.
Affected Countries
Germany, France, United Kingdom, Italy, Spain, Netherlands, Sweden, Finland, Poland
CVE-2025-65563: n/a
Description
A denial-of-service vulnerability exists in the omec-project UPF (component upf-epc/pfcpiface) up to at least version upf-epc-pfcpiface:2.1.3-dev. When the UPF receives a PFCP Association Setup Request that is missing the mandatory NodeID Information Element, the association setup handler dereferences a nil pointer instead of validating the message, causing a panic and terminating the UPF process. An attacker who can send PFCP Association Setup Request messages to the UPF's N4/PFCP endpoint can exploit this issue to repeatedly crash the UPF and disrupt user-plane services.
AI-Powered Analysis
Technical Analysis
CVE-2025-65563 identifies a denial-of-service vulnerability in the open-source omec-project User Plane Function (UPF) component, specifically in the upf-epc/pfcpiface module up to version 2.1.3-dev. The vulnerability arises from improper input validation in the PFCP Association Setup Request handler. When the UPF receives a PFCP Association Setup Request message that lacks the mandatory NodeID Information Element, the handler dereferences a nil pointer instead of validating the message structure. This causes a runtime panic and terminates the UPF process, effectively crashing the user plane function. The PFCP protocol is used between the Control Plane and User Plane in 5G core networks, with the N4 interface being critical for session management and forwarding rules. An attacker capable of sending crafted PFCP messages to the UPF's N4/PFCP endpoint can exploit this flaw remotely without authentication or user interaction. The impact is a denial-of-service condition that disrupts user-plane traffic forwarding, potentially causing service outages or degraded network performance. The vulnerability is tracked as CWE-476 (NULL Pointer Dereference). Although no public exploits are reported yet, the CVSS v3.1 score of 7.5 (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H) indicates a high severity due to network attack vector, low complexity, no privileges or user interaction required, and high impact on availability. No patches are currently linked, so operators must monitor for updates or implement input validation workarounds. This vulnerability highlights the importance of robust protocol message validation in telecom software components.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, particularly telecom operators and 5G network providers using the omec-project UPF, this vulnerability poses a significant risk to network availability. Exploitation can cause repeated crashes of the UPF, disrupting user-plane services that handle data traffic for mobile subscribers. This can lead to degraded service quality, dropped connections, and potential revenue loss. Critical infrastructure relying on 5G connectivity, including emergency services, IoT deployments, and enterprise communications, may experience interruptions. The lack of confidentiality or integrity impact limits data breach risks, but availability degradation in telecom core components can have cascading effects on dependent services. The vulnerability could also be leveraged in larger distributed denial-of-service (DDoS) campaigns targeting telecom infrastructure. European regulators and network operators must prioritize mitigation to maintain service continuity and comply with network resilience requirements.
Mitigation Recommendations
1. Implement strict validation of PFCP Association Setup Request messages at the UPF N4 interface to ensure mandatory Information Elements like NodeID are present before processing. 2. Apply patches or updates from the omec-project as soon as they become available addressing this nil pointer dereference issue. 3. Deploy network-level filtering or rate limiting on the N4/PFCP interface to restrict or monitor incoming PFCP messages from unauthorized or suspicious sources. 4. Use anomaly detection systems to identify unusual PFCP traffic patterns indicative of exploitation attempts. 5. Conduct regular security audits and fuzz testing on protocol handlers to uncover similar input validation flaws. 6. Collaborate with vendors and open-source communities to accelerate patch development and share threat intelligence. 7. Prepare incident response plans for UPF service disruptions to minimize downtime and impact on end users. 8. Consider redundancy and failover mechanisms in UPF deployments to maintain user-plane availability during attacks.
Affected Countries
Technical Details
- Data Version
- 5.2
- Assigner Short Name
- mitre
- Date Reserved
- 2025-11-18T00:00:00.000Z
- Cvss Version
- null
- State
- PUBLISHED
Threat ID: 694451e44eb3efac36a23a56
Added to database: 12/18/2025, 7:11:32 PM
Last enriched: 12/25/2025, 7:56:30 PM
Last updated: 2/7/2026, 1:09:38 PM
Views: 53
Community Reviews
0 reviewsCrowdsource mitigation strategies, share intel context, and vote on the most helpful responses. Sign in to add your voice and help keep defenders ahead.
Want to contribute mitigation steps or threat intel context? Sign in or create an account to join the community discussion.
Related Threats
CVE-2026-2085: Command Injection in D-Link DWR-M921
HighCVE-2026-2084: OS Command Injection in D-Link DIR-823X
HighCVE-2026-2083: SQL Injection in code-projects Social Networking Site
MediumCVE-2026-2082: OS Command Injection in D-Link DIR-823X
MediumCVE-2026-2080: Command Injection in UTT HiPER 810
HighActions
Updates to AI analysis require Pro Console access. Upgrade inside Console → Billing.
Need more coverage?
Upgrade to Pro Console in Console -> Billing for AI refresh and higher limits.
For incident response and remediation, OffSeq services can help resolve threats faster.