Skip to main content
CVE-2025-9288VulnerabilityPublished Updated

CVE-2025-9288: harborist · Improper Input Validation

Source CVE Database V5

0

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 9.1 Critical.

Data as of 25 Oct 2026, 19:02 UTC

CVSS 4.0 base score
9.1Critical
How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.
EPSS
0.7% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 54% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:N

Exploitation evidence

  1. Disclosed: evidence found.

    CVE published 20 Aug 2025

  2. Detectable: no evidence on record.

    No public nuclei template indexed

  3. Weaponised: no evidence on record.

    No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB

  4. Exploited in the wild: no evidence on record.

    Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation

  5. Observed by OffSeq Mirage: no evidence on record.

    No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 2026-10-25.

What to do

AI-suggested

1. Monitor sha.js project repositories and security advisories for official patches or updates addressing CVE-2025-9288 and apply them immediately upon release. 2. In the interim, implement strict input validation and sanitization at the application level before data is passed to sha.js functions to reduce the risk of malicious input manipulation. 3. Conduct thorough code audits to identify and isolate usage of sha.js in your software stack, prioritizing high-risk applications and services. 4. Employ runtime application self-protection (RASP) or web application firewalls (WAF) with custom rules to detect and block suspicious input patterns targeting hashing functions. 5. Increase monitoring and logging around cryptographic operations to detect anomalies indicative of exploitation attempts. 6. Educate development teams about the risks of improper input validation and encourage secure coding practices, especially when handling cryptographic libraries. 7. Where feasible, consider temporary mitigation by replacing sha.js with alternative, well-maintained cryptographic libraries that do not exhibit this vulnerability. 8. Prepare incident response plans specifically addressing potential exploitation scenarios involving cryptographic integrity breaches. 9. Engage with software vendors and third-party providers to ensure their sha.js dependencies are patched or mitigated. 10. Review and strengthen overall input validation frameworks across applications to prevent similar vulnerabilities.

Description

Improper Input Validation vulnerability in sha.js allows Input Data Manipulation.This issue affects sha.js: through 2.4.11.

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…