CVE-2025-9612: CWE-404: Improper Resource Shutdown or Release in PCI-SIG PCI Express Integrity and Data Encryption (PCIe IDE) Specification
An issue was discovered in the PCI Express (PCIe) Integrity and Data Encryption (IDE) specification, where insufficient guidance on Transaction Layer Packet (TLP) ordering and tag uniqueness may allow encrypted packets to be replayed or reordered without detection. This can enable local or physical attackers on the PCIe bus to violate data integrity protections.
AI Analysis
Technical Summary
CVE-2025-9612 identifies a vulnerability in the PCI Express Integrity and Data Encryption (PCIe IDE) specification, specifically related to improper resource shutdown or release (CWE-404). The root cause is insufficient specification guidance on the ordering of Transaction Layer Packets (TLPs) and the uniqueness of tags used in encrypted PCIe communications. PCIe IDE is designed to provide data integrity and encryption for PCIe bus communications, protecting against tampering and eavesdropping. However, the lack of strict requirements for TLP ordering and tag uniqueness allows an attacker with local or physical access to the PCIe bus to replay or reorder encrypted packets without detection. This undermines the integrity guarantees of the encryption scheme, potentially allowing data manipulation or injection attacks. The vulnerability does not require privileges or user interaction but does require physical or local access to the PCIe bus, limiting the attack surface. No patches or mitigations have been published yet, and no known exploits are currently in the wild. The CVSS 3.1 base score of 5.1 reflects a medium severity, with low impact on confidentiality and availability but a tangible impact on data integrity. This vulnerability affects all implementations of the PCIe IDE specification as no affected versions are specifically listed, indicating a design-level issue. Organizations relying on PCIe IDE for secure communications must assess their hardware and firmware implementations for compliance with best practices on TLP ordering and tag management to prevent exploitation.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, the primary impact of CVE-2025-9612 is the potential violation of data integrity on systems using PCIe IDE for encrypted communications. This can lead to undetected tampering or replay of sensitive data transmitted over the PCIe bus, which is critical in environments handling financial transactions, personal data, or industrial control systems. While confidentiality and availability are not directly compromised, integrity violations can cause erroneous processing, data corruption, or unauthorized command execution. Sectors such as finance, telecommunications, manufacturing, and critical infrastructure are particularly at risk due to their reliance on PCIe-based hardware accelerators, network cards, or storage controllers implementing PCIe IDE. The requirement for local or physical access reduces the likelihood of remote exploitation but raises concerns about insider threats and physical security. The absence of known exploits and patches means organizations must proactively evaluate their exposure and implement compensating controls. Failure to address this vulnerability could undermine trust in hardware security measures and lead to compliance issues with European data protection regulations if data integrity is compromised.
Mitigation Recommendations
Mitigation of CVE-2025-9612 requires a multi-layered approach beyond generic advice. First, organizations should conduct a thorough hardware and firmware audit to verify that PCIe devices implementing IDE encryption enforce strict TLP ordering and tag uniqueness as per best practices, even if the specification lacks explicit guidance. Vendors should be engaged to provide firmware updates or design revisions addressing this flaw. Second, implement enhanced monitoring and anomaly detection on PCIe bus traffic to identify unusual packet reordering or replay attempts, using hardware performance counters or specialized PCIe bus analyzers. Third, enforce strict physical security controls to limit local or physical access to systems with vulnerable PCIe devices, including secure server rooms and tamper-evident seals. Fourth, segment critical systems to minimize the risk of lateral movement by attackers with physical access. Finally, maintain up-to-date inventories of PCIe hardware and track vendor advisories for patches or specification updates. Organizations should also consider deploying endpoint detection and response (EDR) solutions capable of detecting suspicious hardware-level anomalies. Collaboration with PCI-SIG and hardware vendors to accelerate specification clarifications and patch development is essential.
Affected Countries
Germany, France, United Kingdom, Netherlands, Italy, Sweden, Finland
CVE-2025-9612: CWE-404: Improper Resource Shutdown or Release in PCI-SIG PCI Express Integrity and Data Encryption (PCIe IDE) Specification
Description
An issue was discovered in the PCI Express (PCIe) Integrity and Data Encryption (IDE) specification, where insufficient guidance on Transaction Layer Packet (TLP) ordering and tag uniqueness may allow encrypted packets to be replayed or reordered without detection. This can enable local or physical attackers on the PCIe bus to violate data integrity protections.
AI-Powered Analysis
Technical Analysis
CVE-2025-9612 identifies a vulnerability in the PCI Express Integrity and Data Encryption (PCIe IDE) specification, specifically related to improper resource shutdown or release (CWE-404). The root cause is insufficient specification guidance on the ordering of Transaction Layer Packets (TLPs) and the uniqueness of tags used in encrypted PCIe communications. PCIe IDE is designed to provide data integrity and encryption for PCIe bus communications, protecting against tampering and eavesdropping. However, the lack of strict requirements for TLP ordering and tag uniqueness allows an attacker with local or physical access to the PCIe bus to replay or reorder encrypted packets without detection. This undermines the integrity guarantees of the encryption scheme, potentially allowing data manipulation or injection attacks. The vulnerability does not require privileges or user interaction but does require physical or local access to the PCIe bus, limiting the attack surface. No patches or mitigations have been published yet, and no known exploits are currently in the wild. The CVSS 3.1 base score of 5.1 reflects a medium severity, with low impact on confidentiality and availability but a tangible impact on data integrity. This vulnerability affects all implementations of the PCIe IDE specification as no affected versions are specifically listed, indicating a design-level issue. Organizations relying on PCIe IDE for secure communications must assess their hardware and firmware implementations for compliance with best practices on TLP ordering and tag management to prevent exploitation.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, the primary impact of CVE-2025-9612 is the potential violation of data integrity on systems using PCIe IDE for encrypted communications. This can lead to undetected tampering or replay of sensitive data transmitted over the PCIe bus, which is critical in environments handling financial transactions, personal data, or industrial control systems. While confidentiality and availability are not directly compromised, integrity violations can cause erroneous processing, data corruption, or unauthorized command execution. Sectors such as finance, telecommunications, manufacturing, and critical infrastructure are particularly at risk due to their reliance on PCIe-based hardware accelerators, network cards, or storage controllers implementing PCIe IDE. The requirement for local or physical access reduces the likelihood of remote exploitation but raises concerns about insider threats and physical security. The absence of known exploits and patches means organizations must proactively evaluate their exposure and implement compensating controls. Failure to address this vulnerability could undermine trust in hardware security measures and lead to compliance issues with European data protection regulations if data integrity is compromised.
Mitigation Recommendations
Mitigation of CVE-2025-9612 requires a multi-layered approach beyond generic advice. First, organizations should conduct a thorough hardware and firmware audit to verify that PCIe devices implementing IDE encryption enforce strict TLP ordering and tag uniqueness as per best practices, even if the specification lacks explicit guidance. Vendors should be engaged to provide firmware updates or design revisions addressing this flaw. Second, implement enhanced monitoring and anomaly detection on PCIe bus traffic to identify unusual packet reordering or replay attempts, using hardware performance counters or specialized PCIe bus analyzers. Third, enforce strict physical security controls to limit local or physical access to systems with vulnerable PCIe devices, including secure server rooms and tamper-evident seals. Fourth, segment critical systems to minimize the risk of lateral movement by attackers with physical access. Finally, maintain up-to-date inventories of PCIe hardware and track vendor advisories for patches or specification updates. Organizations should also consider deploying endpoint detection and response (EDR) solutions capable of detecting suspicious hardware-level anomalies. Collaboration with PCI-SIG and hardware vendors to accelerate specification clarifications and patch development is essential.
Affected Countries
Technical Details
- Data Version
- 5.2
- Assigner Short Name
- certcc
- Date Reserved
- 2025-08-28T15:44:11.594Z
- Cvss Version
- null
- State
- PUBLISHED
Threat ID: 693871e8ef540ebbadbcf671
Added to database: 12/9/2025, 7:00:56 PM
Last enriched: 12/16/2025, 8:07:08 PM
Last updated: 2/7/2026, 12:58:31 PM
Views: 155
Community Reviews
0 reviewsCrowdsource mitigation strategies, share intel context, and vote on the most helpful responses. Sign in to add your voice and help keep defenders ahead.
Want to contribute mitigation steps or threat intel context? Sign in or create an account to join the community discussion.
Related Threats
CVE-2026-2085: Command Injection in D-Link DWR-M921
HighCVE-2026-2084: OS Command Injection in D-Link DIR-823X
HighCVE-2026-2083: SQL Injection in code-projects Social Networking Site
MediumCVE-2026-2082: OS Command Injection in D-Link DIR-823X
MediumCVE-2026-2080: Command Injection in UTT HiPER 810
HighActions
Updates to AI analysis require Pro Console access. Upgrade inside Console → Billing.
Need more coverage?
Upgrade to Pro Console in Console -> Billing for AI refresh and higher limits.
For incident response and remediation, OffSeq services can help resolve threats faster.