CVE-2026-20100: Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input ('Classic Buffer Overflow') in Cisco Cisco Secure Firewall Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) Software
A vulnerability in the LUA interperter of the Remote Access SSL VPN feature of Cisco Secure Firewall Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) Software and Secure Firewall Threat Defense (FTD) Software could allow an authenticated, remote attacker with a valid VPN connection to cause the device to reload unexpectedly, resulting in a denial of service (DoS) condition. This does not affect the management or MUS interfaces. This vulnerability is due to trusting user input without validation in the LUA interprerter. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending crafted HTTP packets to the Remote Access SSL VPN server. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to cause the device to reload, resulting in a DoS condition.
AI Analysis
Technical Summary
CVE-2026-20100 is a classic buffer overflow vulnerability found in the LUA interpreter component of Cisco Secure Firewall Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) and Secure Firewall Threat Defense (FTD) software, specifically within the Remote Access SSL VPN feature. The flaw stems from the LUA interpreter trusting user input without proper size validation during buffer copy operations. An authenticated remote attacker, possessing valid VPN credentials, can exploit this vulnerability by sending specially crafted HTTP packets to the SSL VPN server. This crafted input triggers a buffer overflow condition, causing the device to reload unexpectedly, thereby creating a denial of service (DoS) condition. The vulnerability affects a broad range of Cisco ASA/FTD software versions, primarily within the 9.12.x through 9.23.x series, indicating a long-standing issue across multiple releases. The attack vector is network-based, requiring low complexity and no user interaction, but it does require valid VPN authentication, limiting exploitation to authorized users or compromised credentials. The vulnerability does not affect management or MUS interfaces, focusing the risk on the SSL VPN service. While no public exploits have been reported yet, the high CVSS score of 7.7 underscores the significant risk of service disruption. The vulnerability highlights the critical need for input validation in embedded interpreters and the potential impact of buffer overflows in network security appliances.
Potential Impact
The primary impact of CVE-2026-20100 is a denial of service (DoS) condition caused by device reloads, which can disrupt VPN connectivity for remote users. This can lead to significant operational downtime, especially for organizations heavily reliant on Cisco ASA/FTD devices for secure remote access. The vulnerability does not compromise confidentiality or integrity directly but affects availability, potentially halting business operations, remote workforce productivity, and access to critical internal resources. In environments where Cisco ASA/FTD devices serve as the primary VPN gateway, exploitation could cause widespread network outages. Additionally, repeated exploitation attempts could increase the risk of cascading failures or complicate incident response efforts. Since the vulnerability requires authenticated access, the risk is somewhat mitigated by credential controls, but insider threats or compromised VPN accounts could still lead to exploitation. The broad range of affected software versions means many organizations worldwide could be vulnerable, increasing the potential for large-scale impact if exploited in targeted attacks or automated campaigns.
Mitigation Recommendations
Organizations should immediately verify if their Cisco ASA or FTD devices run affected software versions and prioritize patching to the latest fixed releases once available from Cisco. Until patches are applied, restrict VPN access to trusted users and enforce strong multi-factor authentication (MFA) to reduce the risk of credential compromise. Monitor VPN logs for unusual or malformed HTTP traffic patterns that could indicate exploitation attempts targeting the LUA interpreter. Implement network segmentation to limit the exposure of VPN servers and consider deploying intrusion detection/prevention systems (IDS/IPS) with signatures tuned to detect anomalous SSL VPN traffic. Disable or limit the use of LUA scripts within the SSL VPN feature if feasible, or apply configuration hardening to reduce attack surface. Regularly audit VPN user accounts and promptly revoke access for inactive or suspicious users. Coordinate with Cisco support for any available workarounds or interim mitigations. Finally, maintain robust incident response plans to quickly address potential DoS incidents stemming from this vulnerability.
Affected Countries
United States, United Kingdom, Germany, France, Japan, Australia, Canada, India, Brazil, South Korea, Netherlands, Singapore, Italy, Spain
CVE-2026-20100: Buffer Copy without Checking Size of Input ('Classic Buffer Overflow') in Cisco Cisco Secure Firewall Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) Software
Description
A vulnerability in the LUA interperter of the Remote Access SSL VPN feature of Cisco Secure Firewall Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) Software and Secure Firewall Threat Defense (FTD) Software could allow an authenticated, remote attacker with a valid VPN connection to cause the device to reload unexpectedly, resulting in a denial of service (DoS) condition. This does not affect the management or MUS interfaces. This vulnerability is due to trusting user input without validation in the LUA interprerter. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending crafted HTTP packets to the Remote Access SSL VPN server. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to cause the device to reload, resulting in a DoS condition.
AI-Powered Analysis
Machine-generated threat intelligence
Technical Analysis
CVE-2026-20100 is a classic buffer overflow vulnerability found in the LUA interpreter component of Cisco Secure Firewall Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) and Secure Firewall Threat Defense (FTD) software, specifically within the Remote Access SSL VPN feature. The flaw stems from the LUA interpreter trusting user input without proper size validation during buffer copy operations. An authenticated remote attacker, possessing valid VPN credentials, can exploit this vulnerability by sending specially crafted HTTP packets to the SSL VPN server. This crafted input triggers a buffer overflow condition, causing the device to reload unexpectedly, thereby creating a denial of service (DoS) condition. The vulnerability affects a broad range of Cisco ASA/FTD software versions, primarily within the 9.12.x through 9.23.x series, indicating a long-standing issue across multiple releases. The attack vector is network-based, requiring low complexity and no user interaction, but it does require valid VPN authentication, limiting exploitation to authorized users or compromised credentials. The vulnerability does not affect management or MUS interfaces, focusing the risk on the SSL VPN service. While no public exploits have been reported yet, the high CVSS score of 7.7 underscores the significant risk of service disruption. The vulnerability highlights the critical need for input validation in embedded interpreters and the potential impact of buffer overflows in network security appliances.
Potential Impact
The primary impact of CVE-2026-20100 is a denial of service (DoS) condition caused by device reloads, which can disrupt VPN connectivity for remote users. This can lead to significant operational downtime, especially for organizations heavily reliant on Cisco ASA/FTD devices for secure remote access. The vulnerability does not compromise confidentiality or integrity directly but affects availability, potentially halting business operations, remote workforce productivity, and access to critical internal resources. In environments where Cisco ASA/FTD devices serve as the primary VPN gateway, exploitation could cause widespread network outages. Additionally, repeated exploitation attempts could increase the risk of cascading failures or complicate incident response efforts. Since the vulnerability requires authenticated access, the risk is somewhat mitigated by credential controls, but insider threats or compromised VPN accounts could still lead to exploitation. The broad range of affected software versions means many organizations worldwide could be vulnerable, increasing the potential for large-scale impact if exploited in targeted attacks or automated campaigns.
Mitigation Recommendations
Organizations should immediately verify if their Cisco ASA or FTD devices run affected software versions and prioritize patching to the latest fixed releases once available from Cisco. Until patches are applied, restrict VPN access to trusted users and enforce strong multi-factor authentication (MFA) to reduce the risk of credential compromise. Monitor VPN logs for unusual or malformed HTTP traffic patterns that could indicate exploitation attempts targeting the LUA interpreter. Implement network segmentation to limit the exposure of VPN servers and consider deploying intrusion detection/prevention systems (IDS/IPS) with signatures tuned to detect anomalous SSL VPN traffic. Disable or limit the use of LUA scripts within the SSL VPN feature if feasible, or apply configuration hardening to reduce attack surface. Regularly audit VPN user accounts and promptly revoke access for inactive or suspicious users. Coordinate with Cisco support for any available workarounds or interim mitigations. Finally, maintain robust incident response plans to quickly address potential DoS incidents stemming from this vulnerability.
Technical Details
- Data Version
- 5.2
- Assigner Short Name
- cisco
- Date Reserved
- 2025-10-08T11:59:15.370Z
- Cvss Version
- 3.1
- State
- PUBLISHED
Threat ID: 69a86ce0d1a09e29cb4f155c
Added to database: 3/4/2026, 5:33:20 PM
Last enriched: 3/11/2026, 7:46:49 PM
Last updated: 4/19/2026, 10:51:57 AM
Views: 72
Community Reviews
0 reviewsCrowdsource mitigation strategies, share intel context, and vote on the most helpful responses. Sign in to add your voice and help keep defenders ahead.
Want to contribute mitigation steps or threat intel context? Sign in or create an account to join the community discussion.
Actions
Updates to AI analysis require Pro Console access. Upgrade inside Console → Billing.
External Links
Need more coverage?
Upgrade to Pro Console for AI refresh and higher limits.
For incident response and remediation, OffSeq services can help resolve threats faster.
Latest Threats
Check if your credentials are on the dark web
Instant breach scanning across billions of leaked records. Free tier available.