CVE-2026-25878VulnerabilityPublished 9 Feb 2026

CVE-2026-25878: FriendsOfShopware FroshPlatformAdminer · Missing Authentication

Affects FriendsOfShopware FroshPlatformAdminerSource CVE Database V5

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 6.9 Medium : upgrade to 2.2.1 when convenient.

Data as of 25 Oct 2026, 19:02 UTC

CVSS 4.0 base score

6.9Medium

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 0.4% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 34% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.
Patch: Available – fixed in 2.2.1

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Attack Vector: Network
Attack Complexity: Low
Attack Requirements: None
Privileges Required: None
User Interaction: None
Vulnerable system confidentiality: Low
Vulnerable system integrity: None
Vulnerable system availability: None
Subsequent system confidentiality: None
Subsequent system integrity: None
Subsequent system availability: None

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable system is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed below, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed “remotely exploitable” and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity: Low: The attacker must take no measurable action to exploit the vulnerability. The attack requires no target-specific circumvention to exploit the vulnerability. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable system.
Attack Requirements: None: The successful attack does not depend on the deployment and execution conditions of the vulnerable system. The attacker can expect to be able to reach the vulnerability and execute the exploit under all or most instances of the vulnerability.
Privileges Required: None: The attacker is unauthorized prior to attack, and therefore does not require any access to settings or files of the vulnerable system to carry out an attack.
User Interaction: None: The vulnerable system can be exploited without interaction from any human user, other than the attacker.
Vulnerable system confidentiality: Low: There is some loss of confidentiality. Access to some restricted information is obtained, but the attacker does not have control over what information is obtained, or the amount or kind of loss is limited. The information disclosure does not cause a direct, serious loss to the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system confidentiality: None: There is no loss of confidentiality within the Subsequent System or all confidentiality impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the Subsequent System or all integrity impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the Subsequent System or all availability impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v4.0 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 9 Feb 2026
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 2026-10-25.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Upgrade FriendsOfShopware FroshPlatformAdminer to 2.2.1.

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
FriendsOfShopwareFroshPlatformAdminer	Affected <2.2.1	Fixed in 2.2.1

AI-suggested

1. Upgrade immediately to FroshPlatformAdminer version 2.2.1 or later, where the authentication requirement for the Adminer route is properly enforced. 2. Restrict network access to the /admin/adminer endpoint using firewalls, VPNs, or IP whitelisting to limit exposure to trusted administrators only. 3. Implement web application firewalls (WAF) with rules to detect and block unauthorized access attempts to the Adminer interface. 4. Conduct thorough audits of Shopware installations to identify any instances running vulnerable plugin versions and verify that no unauthorized access has occurred. 5. Monitor database logs and Shopware admin logs for unusual activity indicative of exploitation attempts. 6. Enforce strong authentication and session management policies for all administrative interfaces. 7. Consider disabling or removing the FroshPlatformAdminer plugin if not strictly necessary, reducing the attack surface. 8. Educate administrators on the risks of exposing database management tools without authentication and ensure secure configuration practices are followed. 9. Regularly review and update security policies to include checks for plugin vulnerabilities and misconfigurations.

Description

FroshAdminer is the Adminer plugin for Shopware Platform. Prior to 2.2.1, the Adminer route (/admin/adminer) was accessible without Shopware admin authentication. The route was configured with auth_required=false and performed no session validation, exposing the Adminer UI to unauthenticated users. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.2.1.

Impact

For European organizations using Shopware with the FroshPlatformAdminer plugin versions prior to 2.2.1, this vulnerability poses a significant risk. Unauthorized access to the Adminer interface can lead to exposure of sensitive customer data, intellectual property, and business-critical information stored in the database. Attackers could manipulate or delete data, disrupting business operations and damaging trust. Given the plugin’s role in database management, exploitation could facilitate further attacks such as privilege escalation, data exfiltration, or ransomware deployment. The impact is particularly severe for e-commerce businesses that rely on Shopware for online transactions and customer management. Regulatory compliance risks also arise, as unauthorized data access may violate GDPR and other data protection laws, potentially resulting in fines and reputational damage. The vulnerability’s network accessibility and lack of required authentication increase the likelihood of exploitation if the vulnerable endpoint is publicly reachable. Organizations with exposed admin interfaces or insufficient network segmentation are at higher risk. Although no exploits are currently known in the wild, the vulnerability’s characteristics warrant urgent attention to prevent potential attacks.

CWE-306Missing Authentication for Critical Function (opens in a new tab)
Base weaknessLikelihood of exploit: HighCWE Top 25 (2025): #21OWASP Top 10 A07:2025: Authentication Failures (opens in a new tab)
The product does not perform any authentication for functionality that requires a provable user identity or consumes a significant amount of resources.
Architecture and Design
Divide the software into anonymous, normal, privileged, and administrative areas. Identify which of these areas require a proven user identity, and use a centralized authentication capability.
Architecture and Design
For any security checks that are performed on the client side, ensure that these checks are duplicated on the server side, in order to avoid CWE-602. Attackers can bypass the client-side checks by modifying values after the checks have been performed, or by changing the client to remove the client-side checks…
Architecture and Design
Where possible, avoid implementing custom, "grow-your-own" authentication routines and consider using authentication capabilities as provided by the surrounding framework, operating system, or environment.
OWASP Cheat Sheets
OWASP Authentication (opens in a new tab)
OWASP ASVS 4.0.3
V1.2.3 (opens in a new tab)
V1.2.2 (opens in a new tab)
V1.2.4 (opens in a new tab)
Attack patterns
Choosing Message Identifier (opens in a new tab)
Force the System to Reset Values (opens in a new tab)
Using Unpublished Interfaces or Functionality (opens in a new tab)
Cross Site Request Forgery (opens in a new tab)
Communication Channel Manipulation (opens in a new tab)
From MITRE CWE, MITRE CAPEC and OWASP (Top 10, OpenCRE).

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…

Exploitation evidence

What to do

Affected software

Description

AI analysisMachine-generated, updated 10 Feb 2026, 10:19 UTC

WeaknessesCWE-306

Technical details

References

Community reviews

Related threats