Honeypot: Requests for (Code) Repositories, (Sat, Nov 8th)
This is just a quick diary entry to report that I saw requests on my honeypot for (code) repositories:
AI Analysis
Technical Summary
The reported threat involves automated scanning activity detected by a honeypot, where attackers request paths associated with code repositories and cloud storage configurations. The targeted paths include .git directories (e.g., /.git/logs/refs/remotes/origin/main, /.git/objects/info), GitHub-specific files (.github/dependabot.yml, .github/funding.yml, .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE), GitLab CI and issue templates (.gitlab/issue_templates, .gitlab-ci), and other repository-related files like .git-secret and .svnignore. Additionally, requests target AWS S3 bucket paths such as /aws/bucket, /s3/backup, /s3/bucket, and /s3/credentials. These requests suggest attackers are attempting to locate publicly accessible version control metadata or cloud storage credentials that could reveal source code, configuration details, or sensitive secrets. Such information leakage can facilitate further attacks including code theft, injection of malicious code, or unauthorized cloud resource access. The absence of known exploits in the wild indicates this is currently reconnaissance rather than active exploitation. However, the presence of these scans highlights the risk posed by inadvertently exposed repositories or misconfigured cloud storage. Organizations deploying web applications should ensure that repository metadata directories are not served by web servers and that cloud storage buckets are properly secured with least privilege access. Regular audits of web server configurations and cloud permissions are essential. Monitoring for unusual access to repository-related paths can provide early warning of reconnaissance attempts. This threat underscores the importance of repository hygiene and cloud security best practices to prevent leakage of sensitive development artifacts and credentials.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, the impact of this threat primarily concerns the confidentiality and integrity of source code and sensitive configuration data. Exposure of repository metadata or cloud credentials can lead to unauthorized access to intellectual property, leakage of sensitive business logic, and potential insertion of malicious code into software builds. This can result in reputational damage, regulatory compliance issues (especially under GDPR if personal data is involved), and operational disruptions. Organizations relying heavily on cloud infrastructure and public-facing web applications are particularly vulnerable. Attackers gaining access to AWS credentials could escalate to broader cloud environment compromise, affecting availability and data integrity. The reconnaissance nature of this threat means it is often a precursor to more targeted attacks, increasing the risk profile. European entities in sectors such as finance, technology, and government, which maintain critical or sensitive codebases, face heightened risks. The medium severity reflects the significant potential impact balanced against the requirement for misconfiguration or exposure to enable exploitation.
Mitigation Recommendations
1. Ensure that web servers do not serve repository metadata directories such as .git, .svn, .github, or .gitlab. This can be achieved by configuring web server rules (e.g., .htaccess for Apache, location blocks for Nginx) to deny access to these paths. 2. Conduct regular audits of web application deployments to verify that no repository files or sensitive configuration files are publicly accessible. 3. Implement strict access controls and permissions on cloud storage buckets (e.g., AWS S3), enforcing least privilege and disabling public read access unless explicitly required. 4. Use automated tools to scan for exposed repositories and sensitive files on public-facing infrastructure. 5. Monitor web server logs and intrusion detection systems for unusual requests targeting repository paths or cloud credential files. 6. Educate developers and DevOps teams about the risks of committing sensitive files to repositories and the importance of .gitignore and similar mechanisms. 7. Employ secrets management solutions to avoid embedding credentials in code or configuration files. 8. Regularly update and patch web servers and related infrastructure to mitigate other potential vulnerabilities that could be chained with repository exposure. 9. Consider implementing web application firewalls (WAFs) with rules to block suspicious requests targeting repository paths. 10. Establish incident response procedures to quickly address detected exposures or breaches related to repository leaks.
Affected Countries
Germany, United Kingdom, France, Netherlands, Sweden, Italy
Honeypot: Requests for (Code) Repositories, (Sat, Nov 8th)
Description
This is just a quick diary entry to report that I saw requests on my honeypot for (code) repositories:
AI-Powered Analysis
Technical Analysis
The reported threat involves automated scanning activity detected by a honeypot, where attackers request paths associated with code repositories and cloud storage configurations. The targeted paths include .git directories (e.g., /.git/logs/refs/remotes/origin/main, /.git/objects/info), GitHub-specific files (.github/dependabot.yml, .github/funding.yml, .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE), GitLab CI and issue templates (.gitlab/issue_templates, .gitlab-ci), and other repository-related files like .git-secret and .svnignore. Additionally, requests target AWS S3 bucket paths such as /aws/bucket, /s3/backup, /s3/bucket, and /s3/credentials. These requests suggest attackers are attempting to locate publicly accessible version control metadata or cloud storage credentials that could reveal source code, configuration details, or sensitive secrets. Such information leakage can facilitate further attacks including code theft, injection of malicious code, or unauthorized cloud resource access. The absence of known exploits in the wild indicates this is currently reconnaissance rather than active exploitation. However, the presence of these scans highlights the risk posed by inadvertently exposed repositories or misconfigured cloud storage. Organizations deploying web applications should ensure that repository metadata directories are not served by web servers and that cloud storage buckets are properly secured with least privilege access. Regular audits of web server configurations and cloud permissions are essential. Monitoring for unusual access to repository-related paths can provide early warning of reconnaissance attempts. This threat underscores the importance of repository hygiene and cloud security best practices to prevent leakage of sensitive development artifacts and credentials.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, the impact of this threat primarily concerns the confidentiality and integrity of source code and sensitive configuration data. Exposure of repository metadata or cloud credentials can lead to unauthorized access to intellectual property, leakage of sensitive business logic, and potential insertion of malicious code into software builds. This can result in reputational damage, regulatory compliance issues (especially under GDPR if personal data is involved), and operational disruptions. Organizations relying heavily on cloud infrastructure and public-facing web applications are particularly vulnerable. Attackers gaining access to AWS credentials could escalate to broader cloud environment compromise, affecting availability and data integrity. The reconnaissance nature of this threat means it is often a precursor to more targeted attacks, increasing the risk profile. European entities in sectors such as finance, technology, and government, which maintain critical or sensitive codebases, face heightened risks. The medium severity reflects the significant potential impact balanced against the requirement for misconfiguration or exposure to enable exploitation.
Mitigation Recommendations
1. Ensure that web servers do not serve repository metadata directories such as .git, .svn, .github, or .gitlab. This can be achieved by configuring web server rules (e.g., .htaccess for Apache, location blocks for Nginx) to deny access to these paths. 2. Conduct regular audits of web application deployments to verify that no repository files or sensitive configuration files are publicly accessible. 3. Implement strict access controls and permissions on cloud storage buckets (e.g., AWS S3), enforcing least privilege and disabling public read access unless explicitly required. 4. Use automated tools to scan for exposed repositories and sensitive files on public-facing infrastructure. 5. Monitor web server logs and intrusion detection systems for unusual requests targeting repository paths or cloud credential files. 6. Educate developers and DevOps teams about the risks of committing sensitive files to repositories and the importance of .gitignore and similar mechanisms. 7. Employ secrets management solutions to avoid embedding credentials in code or configuration files. 8. Regularly update and patch web servers and related infrastructure to mitigate other potential vulnerabilities that could be chained with repository exposure. 9. Consider implementing web application firewalls (WAFs) with rules to block suspicious requests targeting repository paths. 10. Establish incident response procedures to quickly address detected exposures or breaches related to repository leaks.
Affected Countries
For access to advanced analysis and higher rate limits, contact root@offseq.com
Technical Details
- Article Source
- {"url":"https://isc.sans.edu/diary/rss/32460","fetched":true,"fetchedAt":"2025-11-08T06:16:02.670Z","wordCount":181}
Threat ID: 690ee0222137a290ee061dc4
Added to database: 11/8/2025, 6:16:02 AM
Last enriched: 11/8/2025, 6:16:17 AM
Last updated: 12/22/2025, 5:44:20 AM
Views: 87
Community Reviews
0 reviewsCrowdsource mitigation strategies, share intel context, and vote on the most helpful responses. Sign in to add your voice and help keep defenders ahead.
Want to contribute mitigation steps or threat intel context? Sign in or create an account to join the community discussion.
Related Threats
CVE-2025-15012: SQL Injection in code-projects Refugee Food Management System
MediumCVE-2025-15013: Stack-based Buffer Overflow in floooh sokol
MediumCVE-2025-15011: SQL Injection in code-projects Simple Stock System
MediumCVE-2025-59301: CWE-20 Improper Input Validation in Delta Electronics DVP15MC11T
MediumCVE-2025-15009: Unrestricted Upload in liweiyi ChestnutCMS
MediumActions
Updates to AI analysis require Pro Console access. Upgrade inside Console → Billing.
External Links
Need enhanced features?
Contact root@offseq.com for Pro access with improved analysis and higher rate limits.