Skip to main content
VulnerabilityPublished Updated

CVE-2024-5430: GitLab · Improper Access Control

Affects gitlabSource GCVE Database

0

Not known to be exploited · fixed in 17.1.1 : update gitlab when convenient.

Data as of 26 Oct 2026, 15:59 UTC

Severity
Medium

Rated by Threat Radar · No CVSS score from NVD or the CNA

EPSS
0.4% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 41% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.
Patch
Available – fixed in 17.1.1, 17.0.3, 16.11.5

Exploitation evidence

  1. Disclosed: evidence found.

    CVE published 28 Jun 2024

  2. Detectable: no evidence on record.

    No public nuclei template indexed

  3. Weaponised: no evidence on record.

    No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB

  4. Exploited in the wild: no evidence on record.

    Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation

  5. Observed by OffSeq Mirage: no evidence on record.

    No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 26 Oct 2026.

What to do

Upgrade gitlab to 17.1.1, 17.0.3 or 16.11.5.

Affected software

ProductAffectedFixed in
Bitnamigitlabpkg:bitnami/gitlabOther threatsAffected
  • >=16.10.0 <16.11.5
  • >=17.0.0 <17.0.3
  • >=17.1.0 <17.1.1
Fixed in
  • 16.11.5
  • 17.0.3
  • 17.1.1

Check your own hosts for these packages with threat-finder (opens in a new tab), our free open-source scanner.

AI-suggested

Upgrade GitLab CE/EE to versions 16.11.5, 17.0.3, or 17.1.1 or later where this vulnerability has been fixed. Since a patch is available, applying the official fix is the recommended remediation.

Description

GitLab CE/EE versions from 16.10 up to but excluding 16.11.5, from 17.0 up to but excluding 17.0.3, and from 17.1 up to but excluding 17.1.1 contain an improper access control vulnerability. This flaw allows a project maintainer to delete the merge request approval policy via GraphQL, which should be restricted. The issue has been addressed in the specified fixed versions.

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…