RoKRAT Shellcode and Steganographic Threats: Analysis and EDR Response Strategies
A new variant of RoKRAT malware used by APT37 has been identified, employing a two-stage encrypted shellcode injection method and steganography to conceal malicious code in image files. The malware uses shortcut files with embedded commands to execute its attack, distributed via compressed archives. It utilizes a complex decoding process involving XOR operations and injects itself into legitimate Windows processes. The threat actor abuses cloud storage services as command and control channels, using Dropbox access tokens. The malware's stealthy nature, including fileless techniques, makes it difficult to detect with traditional security solutions, highlighting the importance of EDR-based defense strategies for real-time monitoring and analysis of abnormal behaviors.
AI Analysis
Technical Summary
The RoKRAT malware variant, attributed to the threat actor APT37, represents a sophisticated and stealthy threat targeting Windows environments. This variant employs a two-stage encrypted shellcode injection technique, which complicates detection and analysis. The initial infection vector involves the distribution of compressed archives containing shortcut (.lnk) files embedded with malicious commands. These shortcut files serve as the execution trigger for the malware. Once executed, the malware uses a complex decoding process involving XOR operations to decrypt its payload. A notable stealth technique employed is the use of steganography, where malicious code is concealed within image files, allowing the malware to evade traditional signature-based detection mechanisms. The malware then injects itself into legitimate Windows processes, leveraging process injection techniques to maintain persistence and evade endpoint defenses. Furthermore, RoKRAT abuses cloud storage services, specifically Dropbox, by using access tokens to establish command and control (C2) channels. This abuse of legitimate cloud infrastructure further complicates detection and attribution. The malware also employs fileless techniques, meaning it operates primarily in memory without writing persistent files to disk, increasing its stealthiness. Due to these advanced evasion tactics, traditional antivirus and signature-based security solutions are often ineffective. The threat highlights the critical importance of Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) solutions capable of real-time behavioral monitoring, anomaly detection, and detailed forensic analysis to identify and respond to such sophisticated threats. The campaign is currently rated as medium severity, reflecting its complexity and stealth but also the lack of known widespread exploitation or critical vulnerabilities.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, the RoKRAT malware poses significant risks, particularly to entities with Windows-based infrastructures. The stealthy nature of the malware, including its fileless execution and use of steganography, means that infections may go unnoticed for extended periods, allowing attackers to conduct espionage, data exfiltration, or lateral movement within networks. The abuse of cloud services like Dropbox for C2 communications can bypass traditional network security controls, increasing the risk of persistent compromise. Confidentiality is at risk due to potential data theft, while integrity and availability could be impacted if the malware is used to deploy additional payloads or disrupt operations. Organizations in sectors such as government, defense, critical infrastructure, and technology are particularly at risk given APT37's historical targeting patterns. The medium severity rating suggests that while the threat is sophisticated, it may require targeted delivery and some user interaction (e.g., opening malicious archives), which could limit its spread but not its impact on high-value targets.
Mitigation Recommendations
1. Deploy and maintain advanced EDR solutions capable of detecting anomalous behaviors such as process injection, unusual use of shortcut files, and memory-resident malware activities. 2. Implement strict controls and monitoring on the use of cloud storage services within the corporate environment, including the detection of unauthorized Dropbox access tokens or unusual outbound traffic to cloud services. 3. Educate users on the risks of opening compressed archives and shortcut files from untrusted sources, emphasizing phishing awareness and safe handling of email attachments. 4. Utilize network segmentation and least privilege principles to limit the ability of malware to move laterally or escalate privileges within the network. 5. Employ threat hunting activities focused on indicators of compromise such as the provided file hashes and behavioral patterns associated with RoKRAT. 6. Regularly update and patch Windows systems and software to reduce the attack surface, even though no specific vulnerabilities are currently exploited. 7. Monitor and analyze image files and other media for steganographic content using specialized tools, especially in environments with high-security requirements. 8. Establish incident response plans that include procedures for detecting and mitigating fileless malware and cloud-based C2 communications.
Affected Countries
Germany, France, United Kingdom, Italy, Spain, Netherlands, Poland
Indicators of Compromise
- hash: 16a8aaaf2e3125668e6bfb1705a065f9
- hash: 443a00feeb3beaea02b2fbcd4302a3c9
- hash: a2ee8d2aa9f79551eb5dd8f9610ad557
- hash: d5fe744b9623a0cc7f0ef6464c5530da
- hash: e4813c34fe2327de1a94c51e630213d1
- hash: fd9099005f133f95a5b699ab30a2f79b
- hash: 2fa0027831cf1e73ec74eae66e1fc130824b776d
- hash: 65f79b9fa476e9aafec16a7995b39c72d4c5e341
- hash: b26a769254487129d64e1043a3eb3a9cbc5ac5fc
- hash: c53bdf6c05c13186a622ed9fd67f9edf2662bd47
- hash: 3fa06c290c477c133ca58512c7852fc998632721f2dc3a0984f18fbe86451e18
- hash: 41d9b6d8cf0fff85bf35327d4b94db629cd9f754c487672911b7f701fe8c5539
- hash: ccb6ca4cb385db50dad2e3b7c68a90ddee62398edb0fd41afdb793287cfbe8e6
- hash: e27467f7fdfa721e917384542ce10cc6108dfd78df14e23872cf8df916e0b8c6
RoKRAT Shellcode and Steganographic Threats: Analysis and EDR Response Strategies
Description
A new variant of RoKRAT malware used by APT37 has been identified, employing a two-stage encrypted shellcode injection method and steganography to conceal malicious code in image files. The malware uses shortcut files with embedded commands to execute its attack, distributed via compressed archives. It utilizes a complex decoding process involving XOR operations and injects itself into legitimate Windows processes. The threat actor abuses cloud storage services as command and control channels, using Dropbox access tokens. The malware's stealthy nature, including fileless techniques, makes it difficult to detect with traditional security solutions, highlighting the importance of EDR-based defense strategies for real-time monitoring and analysis of abnormal behaviors.
AI-Powered Analysis
Technical Analysis
The RoKRAT malware variant, attributed to the threat actor APT37, represents a sophisticated and stealthy threat targeting Windows environments. This variant employs a two-stage encrypted shellcode injection technique, which complicates detection and analysis. The initial infection vector involves the distribution of compressed archives containing shortcut (.lnk) files embedded with malicious commands. These shortcut files serve as the execution trigger for the malware. Once executed, the malware uses a complex decoding process involving XOR operations to decrypt its payload. A notable stealth technique employed is the use of steganography, where malicious code is concealed within image files, allowing the malware to evade traditional signature-based detection mechanisms. The malware then injects itself into legitimate Windows processes, leveraging process injection techniques to maintain persistence and evade endpoint defenses. Furthermore, RoKRAT abuses cloud storage services, specifically Dropbox, by using access tokens to establish command and control (C2) channels. This abuse of legitimate cloud infrastructure further complicates detection and attribution. The malware also employs fileless techniques, meaning it operates primarily in memory without writing persistent files to disk, increasing its stealthiness. Due to these advanced evasion tactics, traditional antivirus and signature-based security solutions are often ineffective. The threat highlights the critical importance of Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) solutions capable of real-time behavioral monitoring, anomaly detection, and detailed forensic analysis to identify and respond to such sophisticated threats. The campaign is currently rated as medium severity, reflecting its complexity and stealth but also the lack of known widespread exploitation or critical vulnerabilities.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, the RoKRAT malware poses significant risks, particularly to entities with Windows-based infrastructures. The stealthy nature of the malware, including its fileless execution and use of steganography, means that infections may go unnoticed for extended periods, allowing attackers to conduct espionage, data exfiltration, or lateral movement within networks. The abuse of cloud services like Dropbox for C2 communications can bypass traditional network security controls, increasing the risk of persistent compromise. Confidentiality is at risk due to potential data theft, while integrity and availability could be impacted if the malware is used to deploy additional payloads or disrupt operations. Organizations in sectors such as government, defense, critical infrastructure, and technology are particularly at risk given APT37's historical targeting patterns. The medium severity rating suggests that while the threat is sophisticated, it may require targeted delivery and some user interaction (e.g., opening malicious archives), which could limit its spread but not its impact on high-value targets.
Mitigation Recommendations
1. Deploy and maintain advanced EDR solutions capable of detecting anomalous behaviors such as process injection, unusual use of shortcut files, and memory-resident malware activities. 2. Implement strict controls and monitoring on the use of cloud storage services within the corporate environment, including the detection of unauthorized Dropbox access tokens or unusual outbound traffic to cloud services. 3. Educate users on the risks of opening compressed archives and shortcut files from untrusted sources, emphasizing phishing awareness and safe handling of email attachments. 4. Utilize network segmentation and least privilege principles to limit the ability of malware to move laterally or escalate privileges within the network. 5. Employ threat hunting activities focused on indicators of compromise such as the provided file hashes and behavioral patterns associated with RoKRAT. 6. Regularly update and patch Windows systems and software to reduce the attack surface, even though no specific vulnerabilities are currently exploited. 7. Monitor and analyze image files and other media for steganographic content using specialized tools, especially in environments with high-security requirements. 8. Establish incident response plans that include procedures for detecting and mitigating fileless malware and cloud-based C2 communications.
Affected Countries
For access to advanced analysis and higher rate limits, contact root@offseq.com
Technical Details
- Author
- AlienVault
- Tlp
- white
- References
- ["https://www.genians.co.kr/en/blog/threat_intelligence/rokrat_shellcode_steganographic"]
- Adversary
- APT37
- Pulse Id
- 68948bfbbc4dd6eff14c08cb
- Threat Score
- null
Indicators of Compromise
Hash
Value | Description | Copy |
---|---|---|
hash16a8aaaf2e3125668e6bfb1705a065f9 | — | |
hash443a00feeb3beaea02b2fbcd4302a3c9 | — | |
hasha2ee8d2aa9f79551eb5dd8f9610ad557 | — | |
hashd5fe744b9623a0cc7f0ef6464c5530da | — | |
hashe4813c34fe2327de1a94c51e630213d1 | — | |
hashfd9099005f133f95a5b699ab30a2f79b | — | |
hash2fa0027831cf1e73ec74eae66e1fc130824b776d | — | |
hash65f79b9fa476e9aafec16a7995b39c72d4c5e341 | — | |
hashb26a769254487129d64e1043a3eb3a9cbc5ac5fc | — | |
hashc53bdf6c05c13186a622ed9fd67f9edf2662bd47 | — | |
hash3fa06c290c477c133ca58512c7852fc998632721f2dc3a0984f18fbe86451e18 | — | |
hash41d9b6d8cf0fff85bf35327d4b94db629cd9f754c487672911b7f701fe8c5539 | — | |
hashccb6ca4cb385db50dad2e3b7c68a90ddee62398edb0fd41afdb793287cfbe8e6 | — | |
hashe27467f7fdfa721e917384542ce10cc6108dfd78df14e23872cf8df916e0b8c6 | — |
Threat ID: 6894c71cad5a09ad00fac0b7
Added to database: 8/7/2025, 3:32:44 PM
Last enriched: 8/7/2025, 3:47:54 PM
Last updated: 9/3/2025, 1:15:49 AM
Views: 45
Related Threats
Cloudflare Mitigates Largest Ever Recorded DDoS Attack at 11.5 Tbps
MediumDissecting RapperBot Botnet: From Infection to DDoS & More
MediumUNVEILING A PYTHON STEALER – INF0S3C STEALER
MediumWanted: Technical Co-Founder for AI Pentesting Agent Startup backed by TryHackMe.
LowThree Lazarus RATs coming for your cheese
MediumActions
Updates to AI analysis are available only with a Pro account. Contact root@offseq.com for access.
External Links
Need enhanced features?
Contact root@offseq.com for Pro access with improved analysis and higher rate limits.