VulnerabilityPublished 28 Oct 2026

CVE-2026-118256: Vue I18n · `escapeParameter` does not escape named values when the same call also passes a list

Affects vue-i18nSource GCVE Database

Mentioned vulnerabilities

CVE-2025-53892

Authoritative record:CVE-2026-118256· Low 2.1

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 2.1 Low : upgrade to 11.4.14 when convenient.

Data as of 28 Oct 2026, 22:12 UTC

CVSS 4.0 base score

2.1Low

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

Patch: Available – fixed in 11.4.14, 12.0.0-alpha.5

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:A/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:L/SA:N

Attack Vector: Network
Attack Complexity: Low
Attack Requirements: Present
Privileges Required: None
User Interaction: Active
Vulnerable system confidentiality: None
Vulnerable system integrity: None
Vulnerable system availability: None
Subsequent system confidentiality: None
Subsequent system integrity: Low
Subsequent system availability: None

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable system is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed below, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed “remotely exploitable” and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity: Low: The attacker must take no measurable action to exploit the vulnerability. The attack requires no target-specific circumvention to exploit the vulnerability. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable system.
Attack Requirements: Present: The successful attack depends on the presence of specific deployment and execution conditions of the vulnerable system that enable the attack. These include: a race condition must be won to successfully exploit the vulnerability (the successfulness of the attack is conditioned on execution conditions that are not under full control of the attacker, or the attack may need to be launched multiple times against a single target before being successful); the attacker must inject themselves into the logical network path between the target and the resource requested by the victim (e.g. vulnerabilities requiring an on-path attacker).
Privileges Required: None: The attacker is unauthorized prior to attack, and therefore does not require any access to settings or files of the vulnerable system to carry out an attack.
User Interaction: Active: Successful exploitation of this vulnerability requires a targeted user to perform specific, conscious interactions with the vulnerable system and the attacker’s payload, or the user’s interactions would actively subvert protection mechanisms which would lead to exploitation of the vulnerability.
Vulnerable system confidentiality: None: There is no loss of confidentiality within the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system confidentiality: None: There is no loss of confidentiality within the Subsequent System or all confidentiality impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system integrity: Low: Modification of data is possible, but the attacker does not have control over the consequence of a modification, or the amount of modification is limited. The data modification does not have a direct, serious impact to the Subsequent System.
Subsequent system availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the Subsequent System or all availability impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v4.0 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 28 Oct 2026
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 26 Oct 2026.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC or the CVSS exploit maturity reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Upgrade vue-i18n and @intlify/core and @intlify/core-base and petite-vue-i18n and @intlify/vue-i18n-core to 11.4.14; vue-i18n and @intlify/core and @intlify/core-base and petite-vue-i18n and @intlify/vue-i18n-core to 12.0.0-alpha.5.

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
npmvue-i18n	Affected >=9.0.0-beta.5 <11.4.14	Fixed in 11.4.14
npmvue-i18n	Affected >=12.0.0-alpha.1 <12.0.0-alpha.5	Fixed in 12.0.0-alpha.5
npm@intlify/core	Affected >=9.0.0-beta.10 <11.4.14	Fixed in 11.4.14
npm@intlify/core	Affected >=12.0.0-alpha.1 <12.0.0-alpha.5	Fixed in 12.0.0-alpha.5
npm@intlify/core-base	Affected >=9.0.0-beta.12 <11.4.14	Fixed in 11.4.14
npm@intlify/core-base	Affected >=12.0.0-alpha.1 <12.0.0-alpha.5	Fixed in 12.0.0-alpha.5

Check your own hosts for these packages with threat-finder (opens in a new tab), our free open-source scanner.

Description

### Summary When `escapeParameter` is enabled (`escapeParameterHtml` in the Legacy API), Vue I18n escapes the interpolation parameters before formatting a message. `escapeParams()` escapes either the list values or the named values, but not both: the two branches are joined by `else`. When a single call passes both, for example `t(key, ['...'], { named: { ... } })`, the named values reach the message without being escaped. ### Details `escapeParams()` in [`packages/core-base/src/translate.ts` (v11.4.13)](https://github.com/intlify/vue-i18n/blob/v11.4.13/packages/core-base/src/translate.ts): ```ts function escapeParams(options: TranslateOptions) { if (isArray(options.list)) { options.list = options.list.map(item => (isString(item) ? escapeHtml(item) : item)) } else if (isObject(options.named)) { // ...escapes the named values } } ``` `t(key, list, options)` is a public overload, and `TranslateOptions` has a `named` field, so a call can carry both. The list is checked first, and the named values are then left as they are. The translated string still goes through `sanitizeTranslatedHtml()` (added for CVE-2025-53892), which neutralizes event handler attributes and `javascript:` URLs. Other markup in the named values, such as links and forms, is inserted as is. Before the fix for GHSA-83rm-6c8r-g728, an `<iframe srcdoc>` in a named value also passes the sanitizer, and script runs. Versions without the sanitizer (before 9.14.5, 10.0.8 and 11.1.10, and 12.0.0-alpha.1 to alpha.3) insert the named values as HTML without any further check. `<i18n-t>` is not affected: it passes either list or named values, never both, and it does not render translations as HTML. ### PoC ```js import { createI18n } from 'vue-i18n' const i18n = createI18n({ legacy: false, locale: 'en', escapeParameter: true, messages: { en: { withList: '{0} {name}', withoutList: '{name}' } } }) const t = i18n.global.t t('withoutList', { name: 'x' }) // x escaped t('withList', ['a'], { named: { name: 'x' } }) // a x not escaped (v11.4.13) ``` ### Impact Applications are affected when they enable `escapeParameter`, render translations as HTML (for example with `v-html`), and pass untrusted named values in the same call as a list. The named values are inserted as markup: phishing links, forms, or layout changes. Together with GHSA-83rm-6c8r-g728, or on versions without the sanitizer, this leads to script execution (DOM-based XSS). ### Patches Fixed in 11.4.14 and 12.0.0-alpha.5. `escapeParams()` now escapes both the list and the named values. The fix also stops rewriting the named object that the caller passes. Before, the values of that object were replaced with their escaped form, so a second call with the same object escaped them twice. v9 and v10 are no longer supported and will not be fixed. Please migrate to v11. ### Workarounds - Do not pass list and named values in the same call when `escapeParameter` is enabled. - Do not render translations that can contain untrusted values with `v-html`. Use component interpolation (`<i18n-t>`) instead.

CWE-116Improper Encoding or Escaping of Output (opens in a new tab)
Class weaknessLikelihood of exploit: HighOWASP Top 10 A05:2025: Injection (opens in a new tab)
The product prepares a structured message for communication with another component, but encoding or escaping of the data is either missing or done incorrectly. As a result, the intended structure of the message is not preserved.
Architecture and Design · Libraries or Frameworks
Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid.
Architecture and Design · Parameterization
If available, use structured mechanisms that automatically enforce the separation between data and code. These mechanisms may be able to provide the relevant quoting, encoding, and validation automatically, instead of relying on the developer to provide this capability at every point where output is generated.
Architecture and Design · Implementation
Understand the context in which your data will be used and the encoding that will be expected. This is especially important when transmitting data between different components, or when generating outputs that can contain multiple encodings at the same time, such as web pages or multi-part mail messages.
OWASP Cheat Sheets
Content Security Policy (opens in a new tab)
Injection Prevention (opens in a new tab)
SQL Injection Prevention (opens in a new tab)
Injection Prevention in Java (opens in a new tab)
Query Parameterization (opens in a new tab)
OWASP ASVS 4.0.3
V14.4.6 (opens in a new tab)
V14.4.4 (opens in a new tab)
V14.4.2 (opens in a new tab)
Attack patterns
Cross Zone Scripting (opens in a new tab)
User-Controlled Filename (opens in a new tab)
Web Server Logs Tampering (opens in a new tab)
AJAX Footprinting (opens in a new tab)
From MITRE CWE, MITRE CAPEC and OWASP (Top 10, OpenCRE).
CWE-79Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') (opens in a new tab)
Base weaknessLikelihood of exploit: HighCWE Top 25 (2025): #1OWASP Top 10 A05:2025: Injection (opens in a new tab)
The product does not neutralize or incorrectly neutralizes user-controllable input before it is placed in output that is used as a web page that is served to other users.
Architecture and Design · Libraries or Frameworks
Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid.
Implementation · Architecture and Design
Understand the context in which your data will be used and the encoding that will be expected. This is especially important when transmitting data between different components, or when generating outputs that can contain multiple encodings at the same time, such as web pages or multi-part mail messages.
Architecture and Design · Implementation · Attack Surface Reduction
Understand all the potential areas where untrusted inputs can enter your software: parameters or arguments, cookies, anything read from the network, environment variables, reverse DNS lookups, query results, request headers, URL components, e-mail, files, filenames, databases, and any external systems that provide…
OWASP Cheat Sheets
Cross Site Scripting Prevention (opens in a new tab)
DOM based XSS Prevention (opens in a new tab)
Injection Prevention (opens in a new tab)
Abuse Case (opens in a new tab)
Deserialization (opens in a new tab)
OWASP ASVS 4.0.3
V5.3.3 (opens in a new tab)
V1.5.1 (opens in a new tab)
Attack patterns
XSS Using MIME Type Mismatch (opens in a new tab)
DOM-Based XSS (opens in a new tab)
Reflected XSS (opens in a new tab)
Stored XSS (opens in a new tab)
Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) (opens in a new tab)
From MITRE CWE, MITRE CAPEC and OWASP (Top 10, OpenCRE).

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…

Exploitation evidence

What to do

Affected software

Description

WeaknessesCWE-116, CWE-79

Technical details

References

Community reviews

Related threats