Skip to main content
Press slash or control plus K to focus the search. Use the arrow keys to navigate results and press enter to open a threat.
Reconnecting to live updates…

CVE-2025-0752: Inconsistent Interpretation of HTTP Requests ('HTTP Request/Response Smuggling')

0
Medium
VulnerabilityCVE-2025-0752cvecve-2025-0752
Published: Tue Jan 28 2025 (01/28/2025, 09:29:33 UTC)
Source: CVE Database V5

Description

A flaw was found in OpenShift Service Mesh 2.6.3 and 2.5.6. Rate-limiter avoidance, access-control bypass, CPU and memory exhaustion, and replay attacks may be possible due to improper HTTP header sanitization in Envoy.

AI-Powered Analysis

AILast updated: 11/20/2025, 20:42:49 UTC

Technical Analysis

CVE-2025-0752 is a vulnerability identified in OpenShift Service Mesh versions 2.6.3 and 2.5.6, specifically related to Envoy's improper HTTP header sanitization. The root cause lies in inconsistent interpretation of HTTP requests between components, a classic HTTP request/response smuggling issue. This inconsistency allows attackers to craft specially formed HTTP requests that bypass rate limiting and access control mechanisms, potentially enabling unauthorized access or privilege escalation. Additionally, attackers can exploit this flaw to perform replay attacks, resubmitting intercepted requests to cause unintended effects, and induce CPU and memory exhaustion, leading to denial of service conditions. The vulnerability requires network-level access and some privileges (PR:L) but does not require user interaction, making automated exploitation feasible in certain environments. The CVSS 3.1 score of 6.3 reflects a medium severity, considering the impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability, combined with the moderate complexity of exploitation. No public exploits have been reported yet, but the presence of this flaw in widely used service mesh infrastructure components poses a significant risk to cloud-native applications relying on OpenShift Service Mesh. The vulnerability highlights the critical need for robust HTTP header validation and consistent parsing logic across proxy components to prevent smuggling attacks that can undermine security controls and service stability.

Potential Impact

For European organizations, the impact of CVE-2025-0752 can be substantial, especially for those leveraging OpenShift Service Mesh in production environments. The ability to bypass rate limiting and access controls can lead to unauthorized access to sensitive services or data, undermining confidentiality and integrity. Replay attacks may cause repeated execution of critical transactions, potentially leading to data corruption or financial loss. CPU and memory exhaustion attacks can degrade service availability, causing downtime or degraded performance in cloud-native applications. Given the growing adoption of container orchestration and service mesh technologies in Europe, particularly in sectors like finance, telecommunications, and public services, exploitation of this vulnerability could disrupt critical infrastructure and services. The medium severity rating suggests that while the vulnerability is not trivially exploitable by unauthenticated attackers, the consequences of successful exploitation warrant prompt attention. Organizations with multi-tenant environments or exposed ingress points are particularly at risk, as attackers could leverage this flaw to pivot within networks or evade security controls.

Mitigation Recommendations

To mitigate CVE-2025-0752, European organizations should: 1) Monitor vendor advisories closely and apply patches or updates to OpenShift Service Mesh and Envoy components as soon as they become available. 2) Implement strict ingress and egress filtering to limit exposure of service mesh components to untrusted networks. 3) Employ Web Application Firewalls (WAFs) or API gateways capable of detecting and blocking malformed HTTP requests indicative of request smuggling attempts. 4) Conduct regular security assessments and penetration testing focusing on HTTP request parsing and header validation. 5) Enable detailed logging and anomaly detection on service mesh proxies to identify unusual traffic patterns or repeated requests that may signal replay or smuggling attacks. 6) Limit privileges of users and services interacting with the mesh to reduce the attack surface. 7) Consider network segmentation to isolate critical service mesh components from less trusted environments. 8) Educate development and operations teams about the risks of HTTP request smuggling and the importance of consistent HTTP header handling across components.

Need more detailed analysis?Get Pro

Technical Details

Data Version
5.1
Assigner Short Name
redhat
Date Reserved
2025-01-27T14:16:01.506Z
Cvss Version
3.1
State
PUBLISHED

Threat ID: 68a87f90ad5a09ad001f8191

Added to database: 8/22/2025, 2:32:48 PM

Last enriched: 11/20/2025, 8:42:49 PM

Last updated: 12/4/2025, 8:27:30 PM

Views: 139

Community Reviews

0 reviews

Crowdsource mitigation strategies, share intel context, and vote on the most helpful responses. Sign in to add your voice and help keep defenders ahead.

Sort by
Loading community insights…

Want to contribute mitigation steps or threat intel context? Sign in or create an account to join the community discussion.

Actions

PRO

Updates to AI analysis require Pro Console access. Upgrade inside Console → Billing.

Please log in to the Console to use AI analysis features.

Need enhanced features?

Contact root@offseq.com for Pro access with improved analysis and higher rate limits.

Latest Threats