CVE-2025-0932VulnerabilityPublished 4 Aug 2025Updated 26 Feb 2026

CVE-2025-0932: Arm Bifrost GPU Userspace Driver · Use After Free

Affects Arm Bifrost GPU Userspace DriverSource CVE Database V5

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 4.3 Medium.

Data as of 25 Oct 2026, 19:02 UTC

CVSS 3.1 base score

4.3Medium

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 0.2% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 21% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N

Attack Vector: Network
Attack Complexity: Low
Privileges Required: Low
User Interaction: None
Scope: Unchanged
Confidentiality: Low
Integrity: None
Availability: None

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable component is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed 'remotely exploitable' and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity: Low: Specialized access conditions or extenuating circumstances do not exist. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable component.
Privileges Required: Low: The attacker is authorized with (i.e., requires) privileges that provide basic user capabilities that could normally affect only settings and files owned by a user. Alternatively, an attacker with Low privileges may have the ability to cause an impact only to non-sensitive resources.
User Interaction: None: The vulnerable system can be exploited without any interaction from any user.
Scope: Unchanged: An exploited vulnerability can only affect resources managed by the same security authority. In this case, the vulnerable component and the impacted component are either the same, or both are managed by the same security authority.
Confidentiality: Low: There is some loss of confidentiality. Access to some restricted information is obtained, but the attacker does not have control over what information is obtained, or the amount or kind of loss is limited. The information disclosure does not cause a direct, serious loss to the impacted component.
Integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the impacted component.
Availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the impacted component.

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v3.1 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 4 Aug 2025
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 2026-10-25.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

AI-suggested

To mitigate CVE-2025-0932, organizations should: 1) Monitor Arm Ltd's official channels for patches and apply updates promptly once available to the affected GPU driver versions. 2) Restrict GPU access to trusted processes only, especially in environments where WebGL or WebGPU is enabled, by implementing strict access controls and sandboxing user processes. 3) Disable or limit WebGL and WebGPU capabilities in browsers or applications where GPU security cannot be guaranteed. 4) Employ runtime monitoring and anomaly detection to identify unusual GPU memory access patterns that could indicate exploitation attempts. 5) For cloud and multi-tenant environments, isolate GPU resources per tenant to prevent cross-tenant data leakage. 6) Review and harden GPU driver configurations and ensure minimal privileges are granted to user-space GPU processes. 7) Educate developers and system administrators about the risks of GPU driver vulnerabilities and encourage secure coding and deployment practices involving GPU acceleration.

Description

Use After Free vulnerability in Arm Ltd Bifrost GPU Userspace Driver, Arm Ltd Valhall GPU Userspace Driver, Arm Ltd Arm 5th Gen GPU Architecture Userspace Driver allows a non-privileged user process to perform valid GPU processing operations, including via WebGL or WebGPU, to gain access to already freed memory.This issue affects Bifrost GPU Userspace Driver: from r48p0 through r49p3, from r50p0 through r51p0; Valhall GPU Userspace Driver: from r48p0 through r49p3, from r50p0 through r54p0; Arm 5th Gen GPU Architecture Userspace Driver: from r48p0 through r49p3, from r50p0 through r54p0.

Impact

The primary impact of CVE-2025-0932 is the potential unauthorized disclosure of sensitive information through access to freed memory in GPU drivers. While the vulnerability does not affect data integrity or system availability, the confidentiality breach could expose sensitive data processed or cached by the GPU, including cryptographic keys, user data, or proprietary computations. Organizations that rely heavily on Arm GPUs in client devices, servers, or cloud environments where GPU acceleration is exposed to user processes or web applications are at risk. This includes mobile devices, embedded systems, and cloud providers offering GPU-accelerated workloads. The vulnerability could be exploited by attackers to escalate information gathering capabilities, potentially aiding further attacks. Although no known exploits exist yet, the ease of exploitation due to low privileges and no user interaction increases the risk of future exploitation. The impact is more pronounced in multi-tenant or shared environments where GPU resources are shared among untrusted users or applications.

CWE-416Use After Free (opens in a new tab)
Variant weaknessLikelihood of exploit: HighCWE Top 25 (2025): #7
The product reuses or references memory after it has been freed. At some point afterward, the memory may be allocated again and saved in another pointer, while the original pointer references a location somewhere within the new allocation. Any operations using the original pointer are no longer valid because the memory "belongs" to the code that operates on the new pointer.
Architecture and Design · Language Selection
Choose a language that provides automatic memory management.
Implementation · Attack Surface Reduction
When freeing pointers, be sure to set them to NULL once they are freed. However, the utilization of multiple or complex data structures may lower the usefulness of this strategy.
OWASP Cheat Sheets
XML Security (opens in a new tab)
Mass Assignment (opens in a new tab)
OWASP ASVS 4.0.3
V13.3.1 (opens in a new tab)
V5.1.4 (opens in a new tab)
V5.1.3 (opens in a new tab)
From MITRE CWE, MITRE CAPEC and OWASP (Top 10, OpenCRE).

References

developer.arm.com/documentation/110626/latest/ (opens in a new tab)

Community reviews

Loading reviews…

Exploitation evidence

What to do

Description

AI analysisMachine-generated, updated 26 Feb 2026, 22:04 UTC

WeaknessesCWE-416

Technical details

References

Community reviews

Related threats