CVE-2025-13186VulnerabilityPublished 14 Nov 2025Updated 17 Nov 2025

CVE-2025-13186: Bdtask Isshue Multi Store eCommerce Shopping Cart Solution · Cross Site Scripting

Affects Bdtask Isshue Multi Store eCommerce Shopping Cart SolutionSource CVE Database V5

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 4.8 Medium.

Data as of 25 Oct 2026, 19:02 UTC

CVSS 4.0 base score

4.8Medium

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 0.2% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 21% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P

Base metrics

Attack Vector: Network
Attack Complexity: Low
Attack Requirements: None
Privileges Required: High
User Interaction: Passive
Vulnerable system confidentiality: None
Vulnerable system integrity: Low
Vulnerable system availability: None
Subsequent system confidentiality: None
Subsequent system integrity: None
Subsequent system availability: None

Threat metrics

Exploit Maturity: POC

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable system is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed below, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed “remotely exploitable” and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity: Low: The attacker must take no measurable action to exploit the vulnerability. The attack requires no target-specific circumvention to exploit the vulnerability. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable system.
Attack Requirements: None: The successful attack does not depend on the deployment and execution conditions of the vulnerable system. The attacker can expect to be able to reach the vulnerability and execute the exploit under all or most instances of the vulnerability.
Privileges Required: High: The attacker requires privileges that provide significant (e.g., administrative) control over the vulnerable system allowing full access to the vulnerable system’s settings and files.
User Interaction: Passive: Successful exploitation of this vulnerability requires limited interaction by the targeted user with the vulnerable system and the attacker’s payload. These interactions would be considered involuntary and do not require that the user actively subvert protections built into the vulnerable system.
Vulnerable system confidentiality: None: There is no loss of confidentiality within the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system integrity: Low: Modification of data is possible, but the attacker does not have control over the consequence of a modification, or the amount of modification is limited. The data modification does not have a direct, serious impact to the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system confidentiality: None: There is no loss of confidentiality within the Subsequent System or all confidentiality impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the Subsequent System or all integrity impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the Subsequent System or all availability impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Exploit Maturity: POC: Based on threat intelligence sources each of the following must apply: · Proof-of-concept is publicly available · No knowledge of reported attempts to exploit this vulnerability · No knowledge of publicly available solutions used to simplify attempts to exploit the vulnerability

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v4.0 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 14 Nov 2025
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 2026-10-25.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
Bdtask Isshue Multi Store eCommerce Shopping Cart Solution	Affected =4.0	Fixed in–

AI-suggested

Given the lack of an official patch, European organizations should implement immediate compensating controls. First, enforce strict input validation and output encoding on the 'Search' parameter within /dashboard/Ccustomer/manage_customer to neutralize malicious scripts. Employ Content Security Policy (CSP) headers to restrict the execution of unauthorized scripts in the browser. Limit access to the vulnerable functionality by applying the principle of least privilege, ensuring only necessary personnel have high-level access. Conduct regular security training to raise awareness about phishing and social engineering, reducing the risk of user interaction exploitation. Monitor logs for unusual activity related to the affected endpoint to detect potential exploitation attempts. Consider deploying Web Application Firewalls (WAFs) with custom rules to block suspicious payloads targeting the vulnerable parameter. Finally, plan for migration or upgrade to alternative eCommerce solutions if vendor support remains absent, to ensure long-term security and compliance.

Description

A weakness has been identified in Bdtask/CodeCanyon Isshue Multi Store eCommerce Shopping Cart Solution up to 4.0. This impacts an unknown function of the file /dashboard/Ccustomer/manage_customer. This manipulation of the argument Search causes cross site scripting. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be exploited. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Impact

For European organizations using the Isshue Multi Store eCommerce Shopping Cart Solution, this vulnerability poses a risk primarily to the integrity of user sessions and the trustworthiness of the platform. Attackers exploiting this XSS flaw could execute scripts in the context of authenticated users, potentially leading to session hijacking, unauthorized transactions, or redirection to malicious sites. This can result in financial losses, data manipulation, and erosion of customer confidence. Since the vulnerability requires high privileges and user interaction, the threat is more pronounced for internal users with administrative access, increasing the risk of insider threats or compromised employee accounts being leveraged. The absence of vendor response and patches prolongs exposure, making timely mitigation critical. European eCommerce businesses, especially those handling sensitive customer data and payment information, could face regulatory scrutiny under GDPR if such attacks lead to data breaches or customer harm. Additionally, reputational damage could affect market competitiveness in the European digital economy.

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…

Exploitation evidence

What to do

Affected software

Description

AI analysisMachine-generated, updated 21 Nov 2025, 22:47 UTC

Technical details

References

Community reviews

Related threats