Skip to main content
CVE-2025-33043VulnerabilityPublished Updated

CVE-2025-33043: AMI AptioV · Improper Input Validation

Affects AMI AptioVSource CVE Database V5

0

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 5.8 Medium.

Data as of 26 Oct 2026, 07:57 UTC

CVSS 3.1 base score
5.8Medium
How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.
EPSS
0.1% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 7% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:H/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:H/A:N

Exploitation evidence

  1. Disclosed: evidence found.

    CVE published 29 May 2025

  2. Detectable: no evidence on record.

    No public nuclei template indexed

  3. Weaponised: no evidence on record.

    No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB

  4. Exploited in the wild: no evidence on record.

    Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation

  5. Observed by OffSeq Mirage: no evidence on record.

    No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 2026-10-26.

What to do

AI-suggested

1. Restrict local administrative access strictly to trusted personnel and enforce the principle of least privilege to minimize the risk of exploitation. 2. Implement strong user authentication and session management controls to prevent unauthorized local access. 3. Monitor BIOS integrity regularly using hardware-based attestation or firmware integrity verification tools to detect unauthorized changes early. 4. Prepare for timely deployment of patches or firmware updates from AMI once available; maintain close communication with AMI and hardware vendors for updates. 5. Employ endpoint security solutions capable of detecting suspicious local activities that could indicate exploitation attempts. 6. Harden physical security controls to prevent unauthorized physical access to systems, reducing the likelihood of local exploitation. 7. Educate system administrators and users about the risks of running untrusted code locally and the importance of reporting suspicious system behavior. 8. Consider BIOS-level security features such as Secure Boot and BIOS write protection to limit unauthorized modifications. 9. Maintain comprehensive logging and auditing of local administrative actions to support incident detection and response. 10. For critical systems, consider hardware replacement or BIOS firmware upgrades if patches are delayed or unavailable.

Description

APTIOV contains a vulnerability in BIOS where an attacker may cause an Improper Input Validation locally. Successful exploitation of this vulnerability can potentially impact of integrity.

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…