CVE-2025-40843: CWE-121 Stack based buffer overflow in Ericsson CodeChecker
CodeChecker is an analyzer tooling, defect database and viewer extension for the Clang Static Analyzer and Clang Tidy. CodeChecker versions up to 6.26.1 contain a buffer overflow vulnerability in the internal ldlogger library, which is executed by the CodeChecker log command. This issue affects CodeChecker: through 6.26.1.
AI Analysis
Technical Summary
CVE-2025-40843 identifies a stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability (CWE-121) within Ericsson's CodeChecker tool, a widely used static analysis and defect tracking extension for Clang Static Analyzer and Clang Tidy. The vulnerability resides in the internal ldlogger library, which is invoked by the CodeChecker 'log' command. Buffer overflow flaws occur when a program writes more data to a buffer than it can hold, potentially overwriting adjacent memory and leading to arbitrary code execution, crashes, or data corruption. This specific overflow can be triggered locally without requiring authentication or user interaction, meaning an attacker with local access to the system can exploit it. The affected versions include all releases up to 6.26.1. The CVSS v3.1 base score is 5.9, indicating medium severity, with the vector AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L, meaning local attack vector, low attack complexity, no privileges or user interaction needed, and impacts on confidentiality, integrity, and availability. No public exploits or patches are currently available, but the vulnerability is published and reserved as of April 2025. CodeChecker is primarily used in software development environments for static code analysis, making this vulnerability relevant to organizations relying on this tooling for secure software development lifecycle processes. Exploitation could allow attackers to execute arbitrary code or cause denial of service conditions on affected systems.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, the impact of CVE-2025-40843 centers on the potential compromise of software development environments that utilize CodeChecker. Successful exploitation could lead to unauthorized code execution, data leakage, or disruption of development workflows, undermining the integrity and confidentiality of source code and analysis results. This is particularly critical for sectors with high reliance on secure software development, such as telecommunications, automotive, aerospace, and critical infrastructure. The vulnerability's local attack vector limits remote exploitation but raises concerns for insider threats or compromised developer machines. Disruption of CodeChecker operations could delay vulnerability detection in software projects, increasing the risk of downstream security flaws. Additionally, integrity breaches could allow attackers to manipulate analysis results, masking vulnerabilities or injecting malicious code. The absence of known exploits reduces immediate risk but does not eliminate the threat, especially as attackers may develop exploits once patches are available. Organizations with stringent compliance requirements (e.g., GDPR) must consider the confidentiality implications of this flaw.
Mitigation Recommendations
1. Monitor Ericsson’s official channels for the release of patches addressing CVE-2025-40843 and apply updates promptly once available. 2. Until patches are released, restrict access to systems running vulnerable CodeChecker versions, limiting usage of the 'log' command to trusted personnel only. 3. Employ strict local access controls and endpoint security measures to prevent unauthorized local exploitation, including enforcing least privilege principles for developer workstations. 4. Conduct regular integrity checks and monitoring of CodeChecker logs and outputs to detect anomalies that may indicate exploitation attempts. 5. Consider isolating development environments or using containerization to limit the impact of potential exploitation. 6. Educate developers and system administrators about the vulnerability and the importance of cautious handling of CodeChecker tools. 7. Review and enhance internal security policies around software development tools to include vulnerability management and rapid patch deployment. 8. Implement runtime protections such as stack canaries, address space layout randomization (ASLR), and control flow integrity (CFI) where applicable to reduce exploitation success.
Affected Countries
Germany, France, Sweden, Finland, United Kingdom, Netherlands, Italy
CVE-2025-40843: CWE-121 Stack based buffer overflow in Ericsson CodeChecker
Description
CodeChecker is an analyzer tooling, defect database and viewer extension for the Clang Static Analyzer and Clang Tidy. CodeChecker versions up to 6.26.1 contain a buffer overflow vulnerability in the internal ldlogger library, which is executed by the CodeChecker log command. This issue affects CodeChecker: through 6.26.1.
AI-Powered Analysis
Technical Analysis
CVE-2025-40843 identifies a stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability (CWE-121) within Ericsson's CodeChecker tool, a widely used static analysis and defect tracking extension for Clang Static Analyzer and Clang Tidy. The vulnerability resides in the internal ldlogger library, which is invoked by the CodeChecker 'log' command. Buffer overflow flaws occur when a program writes more data to a buffer than it can hold, potentially overwriting adjacent memory and leading to arbitrary code execution, crashes, or data corruption. This specific overflow can be triggered locally without requiring authentication or user interaction, meaning an attacker with local access to the system can exploit it. The affected versions include all releases up to 6.26.1. The CVSS v3.1 base score is 5.9, indicating medium severity, with the vector AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L, meaning local attack vector, low attack complexity, no privileges or user interaction needed, and impacts on confidentiality, integrity, and availability. No public exploits or patches are currently available, but the vulnerability is published and reserved as of April 2025. CodeChecker is primarily used in software development environments for static code analysis, making this vulnerability relevant to organizations relying on this tooling for secure software development lifecycle processes. Exploitation could allow attackers to execute arbitrary code or cause denial of service conditions on affected systems.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, the impact of CVE-2025-40843 centers on the potential compromise of software development environments that utilize CodeChecker. Successful exploitation could lead to unauthorized code execution, data leakage, or disruption of development workflows, undermining the integrity and confidentiality of source code and analysis results. This is particularly critical for sectors with high reliance on secure software development, such as telecommunications, automotive, aerospace, and critical infrastructure. The vulnerability's local attack vector limits remote exploitation but raises concerns for insider threats or compromised developer machines. Disruption of CodeChecker operations could delay vulnerability detection in software projects, increasing the risk of downstream security flaws. Additionally, integrity breaches could allow attackers to manipulate analysis results, masking vulnerabilities or injecting malicious code. The absence of known exploits reduces immediate risk but does not eliminate the threat, especially as attackers may develop exploits once patches are available. Organizations with stringent compliance requirements (e.g., GDPR) must consider the confidentiality implications of this flaw.
Mitigation Recommendations
1. Monitor Ericsson’s official channels for the release of patches addressing CVE-2025-40843 and apply updates promptly once available. 2. Until patches are released, restrict access to systems running vulnerable CodeChecker versions, limiting usage of the 'log' command to trusted personnel only. 3. Employ strict local access controls and endpoint security measures to prevent unauthorized local exploitation, including enforcing least privilege principles for developer workstations. 4. Conduct regular integrity checks and monitoring of CodeChecker logs and outputs to detect anomalies that may indicate exploitation attempts. 5. Consider isolating development environments or using containerization to limit the impact of potential exploitation. 6. Educate developers and system administrators about the vulnerability and the importance of cautious handling of CodeChecker tools. 7. Review and enhance internal security policies around software development tools to include vulnerability management and rapid patch deployment. 8. Implement runtime protections such as stack canaries, address space layout randomization (ASLR), and control flow integrity (CFI) where applicable to reduce exploitation success.
Affected Countries
For access to advanced analysis and higher rate limits, contact root@offseq.com
Technical Details
- Data Version
- 5.1
- Assigner Short Name
- ERIC
- Date Reserved
- 2025-04-16T08:59:01.744Z
- Cvss Version
- 3.1
- State
- PUBLISHED
Threat ID: 6901125021370b3f606d87be
Added to database: 10/28/2025, 6:58:24 PM
Last enriched: 10/28/2025, 7:11:59 PM
Last updated: 10/30/2025, 1:53:12 PM
Views: 17
Community Reviews
0 reviewsCrowdsource mitigation strategies, share intel context, and vote on the most helpful responses. Sign in to add your voice and help keep defenders ahead.
Want to contribute mitigation steps or threat intel context? Sign in or create an account to join the community discussion.
Related Threats
X-Request-Purpose: Identifying "research" and bug bounty related scans?, (Thu, Oct 30th)
MediumCVE-2025-10348: CWE-79 Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation (XSS or 'Cross-site Scripting') in Eveo URVE Smart Office
MediumMillions Impacted by Conduent Data Breach
MediumCVE-2025-63608: n/a
HighMajor US Telecom Backbone Firm Hacked by Nation-State Actors
MediumActions
Updates to AI analysis require Pro Console access. Upgrade inside Console → Billing.
External Links
Need enhanced features?
Contact root@offseq.com for Pro access with improved analysis and higher rate limits.