CVE-2025-8341VulnerabilityPublished 4 Aug 2025

CVE-2025-8341: grafana-infinity-datasource · Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)

Affects grafana-infinity-datasourceSource CVE Database V5

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 5.0 Medium · fixed in 3.4.1 : update grafana-infinity-datasource when convenient.

Data as of 25 Oct 2026, 19:02 UTC

CVSS 3.1 base score

5.0Medium

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 0.3% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 27% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.
Patch: Available – fixed in 3.4.1

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N

Attack Vector: Network
Attack Complexity: Low
Privileges Required: Low
User Interaction: None
Scope: Changed
Confidentiality: Low
Integrity: None
Availability: None

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable component is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed 'remotely exploitable' and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity: Low: Specialized access conditions or extenuating circumstances do not exist. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable component.
Privileges Required: Low: The attacker is authorized with (i.e., requires) privileges that provide basic user capabilities that could normally affect only settings and files owned by a user. Alternatively, an attacker with Low privileges may have the ability to cause an impact only to non-sensitive resources.
User Interaction: None: The vulnerable system can be exploited without any interaction from any user.
Scope: Changed: An exploited vulnerability can affect resources beyond the security scope managed by the security authority of the vulnerable component. In this case, the vulnerable component and the impacted component are different and managed by different security authorities.
Confidentiality: Low: There is some loss of confidentiality. Access to some restricted information is obtained, but the attacker does not have control over what information is obtained, or the amount or kind of loss is limited. The information disclosure does not cause a direct, serious loss to the impacted component.
Integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the impacted component.
Availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the impacted component.

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v3.1 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 4 Aug 2025
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponised: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 2026-10-25.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponised: Public exploit code exists in Metasploit or Exploit-DB, or CISA SSVC reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
Grafana grafana-infinity-datasource	Affected =0.6.0	Fixed in–

AI-suggested

To mitigate this vulnerability, European organizations should promptly upgrade the Grafana Infinity datasource plugin to version 3.4.1 or later, where the SSRF issue is fixed. Additionally, organizations should review and tighten access controls on Grafana instances, ensuring that only trusted users have privileges to configure or use the Infinity datasource plugin. Network segmentation should be enforced to limit the Grafana server's ability to reach sensitive internal endpoints. Implementing strict egress filtering and firewall rules can prevent unauthorized outbound requests initiated by the plugin. Monitoring and logging of Grafana datasource requests should be enhanced to detect unusual or suspicious activity indicative of SSRF exploitation attempts. Finally, organizations should conduct security assessments and penetration tests focusing on SSRF vectors within their monitoring infrastructure to identify and remediate any residual risks.

Description

Grafana is an open-source platform for monitoring and observability. The Infinity datasource plugin, maintained by Grafana Labs, allows visualizing data from JSON, CSV, XML, GraphQL, and HTML endpoints. If the plugin was configured to allow only certain URLs, an attacker could bypass this restriction using a specially crafted URL. This vulnerability is fixed in version 3.4.1.

Impact

For European organizations, this SSRF vulnerability in the Grafana Infinity datasource plugin poses a moderate risk. Many enterprises and public sector organizations in Europe rely on Grafana for monitoring critical infrastructure, applications, and services. An attacker exploiting this vulnerability could access internal network resources, potentially exposing sensitive information such as internal APIs, metadata services, or other protected endpoints. This could lead to reconnaissance for further attacks or data leakage. Since the vulnerability requires some level of privileges on the Grafana instance, the risk is higher in environments where Grafana is accessible to multiple users or integrated with other systems. The confidentiality breach could be significant in sectors like finance, healthcare, energy, and government, where internal data exposure can have regulatory and operational consequences. However, the lack of impact on integrity and availability limits the potential for direct disruption or data manipulation.

CWE-918Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) (opens in a new tab)
Base weaknessCWE Top 25 (2025): #22OWASP Top 10 A01:2025: Broken Access Control (opens in a new tab)
The web server receives a URL or similar request from an upstream component and retrieves the contents of this URL, but it does not sufficiently ensure that the request is being sent to the expected destination.
OWASP Cheat Sheets
Server Side Request Forgery Prevention (opens in a new tab)
Unvalidated Redirects and Forwards (opens in a new tab)
Cross Site Scripting Prevention (opens in a new tab)
DOM based XSS Prevention (opens in a new tab)
Authorization (opens in a new tab)
OWASP ASVS 4.0.3
V12.6.1 (opens in a new tab)
V5.2.6 (opens in a new tab)
Attack patterns
Server Side Request Forgery (opens in a new tab)
From MITRE CWE, MITRE CAPEC and OWASP (Top 10, OpenCRE).

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…

Exploitation evidence

What to do

Affected software

Description

AI analysisMachine-generated, updated 4 Aug 2025, 09:02 UTC

WeaknessesCWE-918

Technical details

References

Community reviews

Related threats