VulnerabilityPublished 10 Mar 2026

CVE-2026-0109: Google Android · Denial of Service

Affects Google AndroidSource CVE Database V5

Compare

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 7.5 High.

Data as of 30 Oct 2026, 11:52 UTC

CVSS 3.1 base score

7.5High

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 0.2% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 22% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Attack Vector: Network
Attack Complexity: Low
Privileges Required: None
User Interaction: None
Scope: Unchanged
Confidentiality: None
Integrity: None
Availability: High

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable component is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed 'remotely exploitable' and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity: Low: Specialized access conditions or extenuating circumstances do not exist. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable component.
Privileges Required: None: The attacker is unauthorized prior to attack, and therefore does not require any access to settings or files to carry out an attack.
User Interaction: None: The vulnerable system can be exploited without any interaction from any user.
Scope: Unchanged: An exploited vulnerability can only affect resources managed by the same security authority. In this case, the vulnerable component and the impacted component are either the same, or both are managed by the same security authority.
Confidentiality: None: There is no loss of confidentiality within the impacted component.
Integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the impacted component.
Availability: High: There is total loss of availability, resulting in the attacker being able to fully deny access to resources in the impacted component; this loss is either sustained (while the attacker continues to deliver the attack) or persistent (the condition persists even after the attack has completed). Alternatively, the attacker has the ability to deny some availability, but the loss of availability presents a direct, serious consequence to the impacted component (e.g., the attacker cannot disrupt existing connections, but can prevent new connections; the attacker can repeatedly exploit a vulnerability that, in each instance of a successful attack, leaks a only small amount of memory, but after repeated exploitation causes a service to become completely unavailable).

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v3.1 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 10 Mar 2026
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponized: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 30 Oct 2026.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponized: A Metasploit exploit module or Exploit-DB entry exists (Metasploit scanner modules do not count), or CISA SSVC or the CVSS exploit maturity reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
GoogleAndroid	Affected =Android kernel	Fixed in–

AI-suggested

To mitigate CVE-2026-0109, organizations and users should prioritize applying official patches from Google or device manufacturers as soon as they become available. Until patches are released, network-level controls such as firewalls and intrusion prevention systems should be configured to monitor and block suspicious or malformed TCP traffic targeting vulnerable devices. Employing network segmentation can limit exposure of critical Android devices to untrusted networks. Device management solutions should enforce strict update policies and monitor device health for signs of instability or crashes. Security teams should also review logs for unusual network activity that could indicate exploitation attempts. For enterprises, deploying endpoint detection and response (EDR) tools capable of identifying kernel-level anomalies can provide early warning. Collaboration with mobile carriers to detect and mitigate attack traffic at the network edge can further reduce risk. Finally, educating users and administrators about the vulnerability and encouraging prompt updates will help minimize the attack surface.

Description

In dhd_tcpdata_info_get of dhd_ip.c, there is a possible Denial of Service due to a precondition check failure. This could lead to remote denial of service with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.

Impact

The primary impact of CVE-2026-0109 is denial of service at the kernel level on Android devices. This can cause devices to crash, reboot, or become unresponsive, disrupting user access and device functionality. For organizations, this could lead to interruptions in mobile workforce productivity, loss of communication capabilities, and potential cascading effects on services relying on Android devices. The vulnerability does not allow privilege escalation or data compromise directly but can be used to degrade service availability significantly. Since exploitation requires no user interaction and no additional privileges, attackers can remotely target vulnerable devices en masse, potentially leading to large-scale disruptions. Critical infrastructure relying on Android devices, such as mobile payment systems, communication networks, and IoT deployments, could be particularly affected. The lack of known exploits currently limits immediate risk, but the ease of exploitation and kernel-level impact make this a high-risk vulnerability once weaponized.

CWE-1419Incorrect Initialization of Resource (opens in a new tab)
Class weakness
The product attempts to initialize a resource but does not correctly do so, which might leave the resource in an unexpected, incorrect, or insecure state when it is accessed.
Implementation
Choose the safest-possible initialization for security-related resources.
Implementation
Ensure that each resource (whether variable, memory buffer, register, etc.) is fully initialized.
Implementation
Pay close attention to complex conditionals or reset sources that affect initialization, since some paths might not perform the initialization.
From MITRE CWE, MITRE CAPEC and OWASP (Top 10, OpenCRE).

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…

Exploitation evidence

What to do

Affected software

Description

AI analysisMachine-generated, updated 10 Mar 2026, 21:19 UTC

WeaknessesCWE-1419

Technical details

References

Community reviews

Related threats