CVE-2026-20025: Integer Overflow or Wraparound in Cisco Cisco Secure Firewall Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) Software
A vulnerability in the OSPF protocol of Cisco Secure Firewall ASA Software and Cisco Secure FTD Software could allow an authenticated, adjacent attacker to cause an affected device to reload unexpectedly, resulting in a DoS condition. To exploit this vulnerability, the attacker must have the OSPF secret key. This vulnerability is due to insufficient input validation when processing OSPF link-state update (LSU) packets. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending crafted OSPF LSU packets. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to corrupt the heap, causing the device to reload, resulting in a DoS condition.
AI Analysis
Technical Summary
CVE-2026-20025 is a vulnerability identified in the Open Shortest Path First (OSPF) protocol implementation within Cisco Secure Firewall Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) and Cisco Secure Firepower Threat Defense (FTD) software. The flaw arises from insufficient input validation when processing OSPF link-state update (LSU) packets, specifically leading to an integer overflow or wraparound condition. An authenticated attacker who is adjacent on the network and possesses the OSPF secret key can craft malicious LSU packets that exploit this flaw. The crafted packets cause heap corruption within the device’s memory management, which leads to an unexpected reload of the affected device, resulting in a denial-of-service (DoS) condition. The vulnerability affects a broad range of Cisco ASA software versions, spanning from 9.12.1 up to 9.23.1.13, indicating a long-standing issue across multiple releases. The attack vector requires the attacker to be adjacent to the vulnerable device and have knowledge of the OSPF secret key, which is typically shared among trusted routers in an OSPF area. The CVSS v3.1 base score is 6.8, reflecting a medium severity rating with the vector indicating low attack complexity, low privileges required, no user interaction, and a scope change due to the device reload. There is no impact on confidentiality or integrity, but availability is significantly affected. No public exploits or active exploitation in the wild have been reported at this time. The vulnerability underscores the importance of robust input validation in routing protocol implementations and the risks posed by trusted protocol adjacencies.
Potential Impact
The primary impact of CVE-2026-20025 is a denial-of-service condition caused by device reloads triggered by heap corruption. For organizations relying on Cisco Secure Firewall ASA or FTD devices for perimeter security and routing, this can lead to temporary loss of firewall and routing capabilities, potentially disrupting network traffic and security enforcement. The requirement for adjacency and possession of the OSPF secret key limits the risk to environments where OSPF is actively used and where the attacker can gain network proximity and authentication. However, in large enterprise or service provider networks where OSPF is common, an attacker who compromises a router or gains insider access could exploit this vulnerability to cause network outages or degrade service availability. This could impact critical infrastructure, financial institutions, government agencies, and other sectors relying on Cisco ASA devices for secure and reliable network operations. The lack of confidentiality or integrity impact reduces the risk of data breach or manipulation, but the availability impact can still cause significant operational disruption and potential cascading effects in complex network topologies.
Mitigation Recommendations
To mitigate CVE-2026-20025, organizations should: 1) Apply Cisco’s security patches or software updates that address this vulnerability as soon as they become available, prioritizing devices running affected ASA and FTD versions. 2) Restrict OSPF adjacency to trusted devices only by enforcing strict authentication and network segmentation to limit exposure to untrusted or potentially compromised devices. 3) Regularly rotate and protect OSPF secret keys to reduce the risk of key compromise. 4) Monitor OSPF traffic for anomalous or malformed LSU packets that could indicate exploitation attempts. 5) Implement network access controls to prevent unauthorized devices from establishing adjacency with critical routers or firewalls. 6) Consider deploying redundant firewall and routing paths to maintain availability in case of device reloads. 7) Conduct regular security audits and vulnerability assessments of network devices to identify and remediate similar protocol-level weaknesses. These steps go beyond generic advice by focusing on OSPF-specific controls and operational best practices tailored to the nature of this vulnerability.
Affected Countries
United States, Canada, United Kingdom, Germany, France, Australia, Japan, India, Brazil, South Korea, Netherlands, Singapore, United Arab Emirates, Israel, Italy
CVE-2026-20025: Integer Overflow or Wraparound in Cisco Cisco Secure Firewall Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) Software
Description
A vulnerability in the OSPF protocol of Cisco Secure Firewall ASA Software and Cisco Secure FTD Software could allow an authenticated, adjacent attacker to cause an affected device to reload unexpectedly, resulting in a DoS condition. To exploit this vulnerability, the attacker must have the OSPF secret key. This vulnerability is due to insufficient input validation when processing OSPF link-state update (LSU) packets. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending crafted OSPF LSU packets. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to corrupt the heap, causing the device to reload, resulting in a DoS condition.
AI-Powered Analysis
Machine-generated threat intelligence
Technical Analysis
CVE-2026-20025 is a vulnerability identified in the Open Shortest Path First (OSPF) protocol implementation within Cisco Secure Firewall Adaptive Security Appliance (ASA) and Cisco Secure Firepower Threat Defense (FTD) software. The flaw arises from insufficient input validation when processing OSPF link-state update (LSU) packets, specifically leading to an integer overflow or wraparound condition. An authenticated attacker who is adjacent on the network and possesses the OSPF secret key can craft malicious LSU packets that exploit this flaw. The crafted packets cause heap corruption within the device’s memory management, which leads to an unexpected reload of the affected device, resulting in a denial-of-service (DoS) condition. The vulnerability affects a broad range of Cisco ASA software versions, spanning from 9.12.1 up to 9.23.1.13, indicating a long-standing issue across multiple releases. The attack vector requires the attacker to be adjacent to the vulnerable device and have knowledge of the OSPF secret key, which is typically shared among trusted routers in an OSPF area. The CVSS v3.1 base score is 6.8, reflecting a medium severity rating with the vector indicating low attack complexity, low privileges required, no user interaction, and a scope change due to the device reload. There is no impact on confidentiality or integrity, but availability is significantly affected. No public exploits or active exploitation in the wild have been reported at this time. The vulnerability underscores the importance of robust input validation in routing protocol implementations and the risks posed by trusted protocol adjacencies.
Potential Impact
The primary impact of CVE-2026-20025 is a denial-of-service condition caused by device reloads triggered by heap corruption. For organizations relying on Cisco Secure Firewall ASA or FTD devices for perimeter security and routing, this can lead to temporary loss of firewall and routing capabilities, potentially disrupting network traffic and security enforcement. The requirement for adjacency and possession of the OSPF secret key limits the risk to environments where OSPF is actively used and where the attacker can gain network proximity and authentication. However, in large enterprise or service provider networks where OSPF is common, an attacker who compromises a router or gains insider access could exploit this vulnerability to cause network outages or degrade service availability. This could impact critical infrastructure, financial institutions, government agencies, and other sectors relying on Cisco ASA devices for secure and reliable network operations. The lack of confidentiality or integrity impact reduces the risk of data breach or manipulation, but the availability impact can still cause significant operational disruption and potential cascading effects in complex network topologies.
Mitigation Recommendations
To mitigate CVE-2026-20025, organizations should: 1) Apply Cisco’s security patches or software updates that address this vulnerability as soon as they become available, prioritizing devices running affected ASA and FTD versions. 2) Restrict OSPF adjacency to trusted devices only by enforcing strict authentication and network segmentation to limit exposure to untrusted or potentially compromised devices. 3) Regularly rotate and protect OSPF secret keys to reduce the risk of key compromise. 4) Monitor OSPF traffic for anomalous or malformed LSU packets that could indicate exploitation attempts. 5) Implement network access controls to prevent unauthorized devices from establishing adjacency with critical routers or firewalls. 6) Consider deploying redundant firewall and routing paths to maintain availability in case of device reloads. 7) Conduct regular security audits and vulnerability assessments of network devices to identify and remediate similar protocol-level weaknesses. These steps go beyond generic advice by focusing on OSPF-specific controls and operational best practices tailored to the nature of this vulnerability.
Technical Details
- Data Version
- 5.2
- Assigner Short Name
- cisco
- Date Reserved
- 2025-10-08T11:59:15.352Z
- Cvss Version
- 3.1
- State
- PUBLISHED
Threat ID: 69a881f6d1a09e29cb67597c
Added to database: 3/4/2026, 7:03:18 PM
Last enriched: 3/11/2026, 8:07:00 PM
Last updated: 4/19/2026, 12:18:34 AM
Views: 86
Community Reviews
0 reviewsCrowdsource mitigation strategies, share intel context, and vote on the most helpful responses. Sign in to add your voice and help keep defenders ahead.
Want to contribute mitigation steps or threat intel context? Sign in or create an account to join the community discussion.
Actions
Updates to AI analysis require Pro Console access. Upgrade inside Console → Billing.
External Links
Need more coverage?
Upgrade to Pro Console for AI refresh and higher limits.
For incident response and remediation, OffSeq services can help resolve threats faster.
Latest Threats
Check if your credentials are on the dark web
Instant breach scanning across billions of leaked records. Free tier available.