VulnerabilityPublished 11 Mar 2026Updated 14 Mar 2026

CVE-2026-3937: Google Chrome · Incorrect Security UI

Affects Google ChromeSource CVE Database V5

Compare

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 6.5 Medium : upgrade to 146.0.7680.71 when convenient.

Data as of 30 Oct 2026, 11:52 UTC

CVSS 3.1 base score

6.5Medium

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

EPSS: 0.1% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 8% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.
Patch: Available – fixed in 146.0.7680.71

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N

Attack Vector: Network
Attack Complexity: Low
Privileges Required: None
User Interaction: Required
Scope: Unchanged
Confidentiality: None
Integrity: High
Availability: None

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable component is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed 'remotely exploitable' and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity: Low: Specialized access conditions or extenuating circumstances do not exist. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable component.
Privileges Required: None: The attacker is unauthorized prior to attack, and therefore does not require any access to settings or files to carry out an attack.
User Interaction: Required: Successful exploitation of this vulnerability requires a user to take some action before the vulnerability can be exploited.
Scope: Unchanged: An exploited vulnerability can only affect resources managed by the same security authority. In this case, the vulnerable component and the impacted component are either the same, or both are managed by the same security authority.
Confidentiality: None: There is no loss of confidentiality within the impacted component.
Integrity: High: There is a total loss of integrity, or a complete loss of protection. For example, the attacker is able to modify any/all files protected by the impacted component. Alternatively, only some files can be modified, but malicious modification would present a direct, serious consequence to the impacted component.
Availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the impacted component.

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v3.1 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 11 Mar 2026
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponized: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 30 Oct 2026.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponized: A Metasploit exploit module or Exploit-DB entry exists (Metasploit scanner modules do not count), or CISA SSVC or the CVSS exploit maturity reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Upgrade Google Chrome to 146.0.7680.71.

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
GoogleChrome	Affected >=146.0.7680.71 <146.0.7680.71	Fixed in 146.0.7680.71

AI-suggested

To mitigate CVE-2026-3937, organizations and users should immediately update Google Chrome on Android devices to version 146.0.7680.71 or later, where the vulnerability has been patched. Beyond patching, organizations should implement mobile device management (MDM) policies to enforce timely browser updates and restrict installation of untrusted applications. Security awareness training should emphasize caution when interacting with download prompts and suspicious web content, highlighting the risk of UI spoofing. Deploying web filtering solutions that block access to known malicious sites can reduce exposure to crafted HTML pages designed to exploit this vulnerability. Additionally, consider using browser extensions or security tools that verify download authenticity or provide enhanced UI integrity checks. Monitoring network traffic for unusual download activity and employing endpoint detection and response (EDR) solutions can help identify exploitation attempts. Finally, organizations should maintain an inventory of devices running vulnerable Chrome versions to prioritize patch deployment and risk management.

Description

Incorrect security UI in Downloads in Google Chrome on Android prior to 146.0.7680.71 allowed a remote attacker to perform UI spoofing via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Low)

Impact

The primary impact of CVE-2026-3937 is on the integrity of the user interface, which can lead to UI spoofing attacks. Attackers can craft malicious HTML pages that deceive users by displaying fake or misleading download prompts or security indicators. This can result in users inadvertently downloading malicious files, disclosing sensitive information, or performing unintended actions. While confidentiality and availability are not directly affected, the integrity compromise can facilitate phishing and social engineering campaigns, increasing the risk of downstream malware infections or credential theft. Organizations with large mobile workforces or those relying heavily on Android devices for web access are at increased risk. The vulnerability could undermine user trust in the browser’s security indicators, potentially leading to broader security awareness issues. Since exploitation requires user interaction but no privileges, the attack surface is broad, especially in environments where users frequently browse untrusted websites. The absence of known exploits in the wild reduces immediate risk but does not eliminate the potential for future attacks.

CWE-451User Interface (UI) Misrepresentation of Critical Information (opens in a new tab)
Class weaknessOWASP Top 10 A06:2025: Insecure Design (opens in a new tab)
The user interface (UI) does not properly represent critical information to the user, allowing the information - or its source - to be obscured or spoofed. This is often a component in phishing attacks.
Implementation · Input Validation
Perform data validation (e.g. syntax, length, etc.) before interpreting the data.
Architecture and Design · Output Encoding
Create a strategy for presenting information, and plan for how to display unusual characters.
OWASP Cheat Sheets
Secure Design Principles (opens in a new tab)
Attack patterns
Spear Phishing (opens in a new tab)
Mobile Phishing (opens in a new tab)
Phishing (opens in a new tab)
Resource Location Spoofing (opens in a new tab)
Action Spoofing (opens in a new tab)
From MITRE CWE, MITRE CAPEC and OWASP (Top 10, OpenCRE).

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…

Exploitation evidence

What to do

Affected software

Description

AI analysisMachine-generated, updated 20 Mar 2026, 02:22 UTC

WeaknessesCWE-451

Technical details

References

Community reviews

Related threats