CVE-2022-48733: Vulnerability in Linux Linux
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: btrfs: fix use-after-free after failure to create a snapshot At ioctl.c:create_snapshot(), we allocate a pending snapshot structure and then attach it to the transaction's list of pending snapshots. After that we call btrfs_commit_transaction(), and if that returns an error we jump to 'fail' label, where we kfree() the pending snapshot structure. This can result in a later use-after-free of the pending snapshot: 1) We allocated the pending snapshot and added it to the transaction's list of pending snapshots; 2) We call btrfs_commit_transaction(), and it fails either at the first call to btrfs_run_delayed_refs() or btrfs_start_dirty_block_groups(). In both cases, we don't abort the transaction and we release our transaction handle. We jump to the 'fail' label and free the pending snapshot structure. We return with the pending snapshot still in the transaction's list; 3) Another task commits the transaction. This time there's no error at all, and then during the transaction commit it accesses a pointer to the pending snapshot structure that the snapshot creation task has already freed, resulting in a user-after-free. This issue could actually be detected by smatch, which produced the following warning: fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:843 create_snapshot() warn: '&pending_snapshot->list' not removed from list So fix this by not having the snapshot creation ioctl directly add the pending snapshot to the transaction's list. Instead add the pending snapshot to the transaction handle, and then at btrfs_commit_transaction() we add the snapshot to the list only when we can guarantee that any error returned after that point will result in a transaction abort, in which case the ioctl code can safely free the pending snapshot and no one can access it anymore.
AI Analysis
Technical Summary
CVE-2022-48733 is a use-after-free vulnerability in the Linux kernel's Btrfs filesystem implementation, specifically in the snapshot creation code path. The issue arises in the ioctl handler create_snapshot() where a pending snapshot structure is allocated and added to a transaction's list of pending snapshots before the transaction commit is attempted. If the transaction commit fails early (e.g., during btrfs_run_delayed_refs() or btrfs_start_dirty_block_groups()), the code frees the pending snapshot structure but does not remove it from the transaction's list. Subsequently, when another task commits the transaction successfully, it accesses the dangling pointer to the freed pending snapshot, causing a use-after-free condition. This can lead to memory corruption, kernel crashes, or potentially privilege escalation if exploited. The root cause is improper management of the lifecycle of the pending snapshot structure and its list membership during error handling. The fix involves deferring adding the pending snapshot to the transaction's list until the commit stage where errors guarantee transaction abort, ensuring safe cleanup without dangling pointers. This vulnerability affects Linux kernel versions identified by the given commit hashes and was publicly disclosed on June 20, 2024. No known exploits are reported in the wild yet.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, this vulnerability poses a significant risk primarily to servers and systems running Linux with Btrfs filesystems, which are increasingly used in enterprise environments for their advanced features like snapshots and checksumming. Exploitation could allow local attackers or malicious processes with limited privileges to trigger kernel memory corruption, potentially leading to denial of service via kernel panic or escalation of privileges to root. This could compromise confidentiality, integrity, and availability of critical systems, especially those handling sensitive data or providing essential services. Given the kernel-level nature of the flaw, successful exploitation could undermine system security controls and facilitate further attacks or persistent footholds. Organizations relying on Linux-based infrastructure, including cloud providers, data centers, and critical infrastructure operators in Europe, must treat this vulnerability seriously to avoid operational disruption and data breaches.
Mitigation Recommendations
1. Immediate application of the official Linux kernel patches that address CVE-2022-48733 is the most effective mitigation. Organizations should prioritize updating kernels to versions that include the fix or backport the patch if using long-term support kernels. 2. Where patching is delayed, restrict access to systems with Btrfs filesystems to trusted users only, minimizing the risk of local exploitation. 3. Monitor kernel logs and system behavior for signs of memory corruption or crashes that could indicate exploitation attempts. 4. Employ kernel hardening techniques such as Kernel Address Space Layout Randomization (KASLR), Kernel Page Table Isolation (KPTI), and seccomp filters to reduce attack surface. 5. For environments using containerization or virtualization, isolate workloads to limit the impact of a compromised kernel. 6. Conduct thorough testing of kernel updates in staging environments to ensure stability before deployment in production. 7. Maintain up-to-date incident response plans that include procedures for kernel-level compromises.
Affected Countries
Germany, France, United Kingdom, Netherlands, Sweden, Finland, Poland, Italy, Spain
CVE-2022-48733: Vulnerability in Linux Linux
Description
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: btrfs: fix use-after-free after failure to create a snapshot At ioctl.c:create_snapshot(), we allocate a pending snapshot structure and then attach it to the transaction's list of pending snapshots. After that we call btrfs_commit_transaction(), and if that returns an error we jump to 'fail' label, where we kfree() the pending snapshot structure. This can result in a later use-after-free of the pending snapshot: 1) We allocated the pending snapshot and added it to the transaction's list of pending snapshots; 2) We call btrfs_commit_transaction(), and it fails either at the first call to btrfs_run_delayed_refs() or btrfs_start_dirty_block_groups(). In both cases, we don't abort the transaction and we release our transaction handle. We jump to the 'fail' label and free the pending snapshot structure. We return with the pending snapshot still in the transaction's list; 3) Another task commits the transaction. This time there's no error at all, and then during the transaction commit it accesses a pointer to the pending snapshot structure that the snapshot creation task has already freed, resulting in a user-after-free. This issue could actually be detected by smatch, which produced the following warning: fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:843 create_snapshot() warn: '&pending_snapshot->list' not removed from list So fix this by not having the snapshot creation ioctl directly add the pending snapshot to the transaction's list. Instead add the pending snapshot to the transaction handle, and then at btrfs_commit_transaction() we add the snapshot to the list only when we can guarantee that any error returned after that point will result in a transaction abort, in which case the ioctl code can safely free the pending snapshot and no one can access it anymore.
AI-Powered Analysis
Technical Analysis
CVE-2022-48733 is a use-after-free vulnerability in the Linux kernel's Btrfs filesystem implementation, specifically in the snapshot creation code path. The issue arises in the ioctl handler create_snapshot() where a pending snapshot structure is allocated and added to a transaction's list of pending snapshots before the transaction commit is attempted. If the transaction commit fails early (e.g., during btrfs_run_delayed_refs() or btrfs_start_dirty_block_groups()), the code frees the pending snapshot structure but does not remove it from the transaction's list. Subsequently, when another task commits the transaction successfully, it accesses the dangling pointer to the freed pending snapshot, causing a use-after-free condition. This can lead to memory corruption, kernel crashes, or potentially privilege escalation if exploited. The root cause is improper management of the lifecycle of the pending snapshot structure and its list membership during error handling. The fix involves deferring adding the pending snapshot to the transaction's list until the commit stage where errors guarantee transaction abort, ensuring safe cleanup without dangling pointers. This vulnerability affects Linux kernel versions identified by the given commit hashes and was publicly disclosed on June 20, 2024. No known exploits are reported in the wild yet.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, this vulnerability poses a significant risk primarily to servers and systems running Linux with Btrfs filesystems, which are increasingly used in enterprise environments for their advanced features like snapshots and checksumming. Exploitation could allow local attackers or malicious processes with limited privileges to trigger kernel memory corruption, potentially leading to denial of service via kernel panic or escalation of privileges to root. This could compromise confidentiality, integrity, and availability of critical systems, especially those handling sensitive data or providing essential services. Given the kernel-level nature of the flaw, successful exploitation could undermine system security controls and facilitate further attacks or persistent footholds. Organizations relying on Linux-based infrastructure, including cloud providers, data centers, and critical infrastructure operators in Europe, must treat this vulnerability seriously to avoid operational disruption and data breaches.
Mitigation Recommendations
1. Immediate application of the official Linux kernel patches that address CVE-2022-48733 is the most effective mitigation. Organizations should prioritize updating kernels to versions that include the fix or backport the patch if using long-term support kernels. 2. Where patching is delayed, restrict access to systems with Btrfs filesystems to trusted users only, minimizing the risk of local exploitation. 3. Monitor kernel logs and system behavior for signs of memory corruption or crashes that could indicate exploitation attempts. 4. Employ kernel hardening techniques such as Kernel Address Space Layout Randomization (KASLR), Kernel Page Table Isolation (KPTI), and seccomp filters to reduce attack surface. 5. For environments using containerization or virtualization, isolate workloads to limit the impact of a compromised kernel. 6. Conduct thorough testing of kernel updates in staging environments to ensure stability before deployment in production. 7. Maintain up-to-date incident response plans that include procedures for kernel-level compromises.
Affected Countries
For access to advanced analysis and higher rate limits, contact root@offseq.com
Technical Details
- Data Version
- 5.1
- Assigner Short Name
- Linux
- Date Reserved
- 2024-06-20T11:09:39.053Z
- Cisa Enriched
- true
- Cvss Version
- null
- State
- PUBLISHED
Threat ID: 682d982ec4522896dcbe5fdd
Added to database: 5/21/2025, 9:09:02 AM
Last enriched: 6/30/2025, 7:56:54 PM
Last updated: 7/31/2025, 3:03:03 AM
Views: 7
Related Threats
Top Israeli Cybersecurity Director Arrested in US Child Exploitation Sting
HighCVE-2025-8878: CWE-94 Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection') in properfraction Paid Membership Plugin, Ecommerce, User Registration Form, Login Form, User Profile & Restrict Content – ProfilePress
MediumCVE-2025-8143: CWE-79 Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') in pencidesign Soledad
MediumCVE-2025-8142: CWE-98 Improper Control of Filename for Include/Require Statement in PHP Program ('PHP Remote File Inclusion') in pencidesign Soledad
HighCVE-2025-8105: CWE-94 Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection') in pencidesign Soledad
HighActions
Updates to AI analysis are available only with a Pro account. Contact root@offseq.com for access.
External Links
Need enhanced features?
Contact root@offseq.com for Pro access with improved analysis and higher rate limits.