CVE-2024-38206: CWE-918: Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in Microsoft Microsoft Copilot Studio
An authenticated attacker can bypass Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) protection in Microsoft Copilot Studio to leak sensitive information over a network.
AI Analysis
Technical Summary
CVE-2024-38206 is a high-severity Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability identified in Microsoft Copilot Studio, a product by Microsoft. SSRF vulnerabilities occur when an attacker can manipulate a server to make unauthorized requests to internal or external resources, potentially bypassing network protections. In this case, the vulnerability allows an authenticated attacker to bypass existing SSRF protections within Microsoft Copilot Studio, enabling them to craft requests that the server processes on their behalf. This can lead to the leakage of sensitive information over the network. The vulnerability is classified under CWE-918, which specifically relates to SSRF issues. The CVSS v3.1 base score is 8.5, indicating a high severity level. The vector string (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N/E:U/RL:O/RC:C) shows that the attack can be performed remotely over the network (AV:N) with low attack complexity (AC:L), requires privileges (PR:L) but no user interaction (UI:N). The scope is changed (S:C), meaning the vulnerability affects resources beyond the initially vulnerable component. Confidentiality impact is high (C:H), integrity impact is low (I:L), and availability impact is none (A:N). The exploitability is currently unknown with no known exploits in the wild. No specific affected versions are listed, but the vulnerability is confirmed in Microsoft Copilot Studio. The vulnerability was reserved in June 2024 and published in August 2024. This SSRF flaw could allow attackers to access internal services or sensitive data that should be protected behind firewalls or network segmentation, potentially leading to data breaches or further exploitation within an organization's network.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, the impact of this SSRF vulnerability in Microsoft Copilot Studio can be significant, especially for enterprises relying on this product for AI-driven development or automation workflows. The high confidentiality impact means sensitive internal data or configuration details could be exposed to attackers, potentially including intellectual property, customer data, or internal network topology. Since the vulnerability requires authentication but no user interaction, attackers who have compromised or obtained valid credentials could exploit this flaw to escalate their access or move laterally within the network. This could lead to data leakage, compliance violations (e.g., GDPR breaches), and reputational damage. The changed scope indicates that the attack could affect other components or services beyond Copilot Studio itself, increasing the risk of broader compromise. Given the critical role Microsoft products often play in European enterprises and public sector organizations, exploitation could disrupt business operations or expose sensitive government or corporate data. Additionally, the lack of known exploits currently provides a window for mitigation, but organizations should act promptly to reduce risk.
Mitigation Recommendations
1. Immediate mitigation should include restricting access to Microsoft Copilot Studio to only trusted and necessary users, enforcing strong authentication and monitoring for unusual access patterns. 2. Network segmentation should be reviewed and enforced to limit the ability of Copilot Studio to make arbitrary network requests, especially to internal services that do not need to be accessed by this product. 3. Implement strict egress filtering and firewall rules to control outbound requests from the Copilot Studio environment, minimizing the attack surface for SSRF exploitation. 4. Monitor logs and network traffic for anomalous requests originating from Copilot Studio that could indicate SSRF attempts. 5. Apply the official security patches or updates from Microsoft as soon as they become available; in the absence of patches, consider temporary disabling or limiting the use of affected features. 6. Conduct internal security assessments and penetration tests focusing on SSRF vectors within Copilot Studio deployments. 7. Educate administrators and users about the risks of SSRF and the importance of credential security since authentication is required for exploitation. 8. Coordinate with Microsoft support and stay updated on advisories related to this vulnerability for any new mitigation guidance or exploit information.
Affected Countries
Germany, France, United Kingdom, Netherlands, Sweden, Italy, Spain, Belgium, Poland, Ireland
CVE-2024-38206: CWE-918: Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in Microsoft Microsoft Copilot Studio
Description
An authenticated attacker can bypass Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) protection in Microsoft Copilot Studio to leak sensitive information over a network.
AI-Powered Analysis
Technical Analysis
CVE-2024-38206 is a high-severity Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability identified in Microsoft Copilot Studio, a product by Microsoft. SSRF vulnerabilities occur when an attacker can manipulate a server to make unauthorized requests to internal or external resources, potentially bypassing network protections. In this case, the vulnerability allows an authenticated attacker to bypass existing SSRF protections within Microsoft Copilot Studio, enabling them to craft requests that the server processes on their behalf. This can lead to the leakage of sensitive information over the network. The vulnerability is classified under CWE-918, which specifically relates to SSRF issues. The CVSS v3.1 base score is 8.5, indicating a high severity level. The vector string (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N/E:U/RL:O/RC:C) shows that the attack can be performed remotely over the network (AV:N) with low attack complexity (AC:L), requires privileges (PR:L) but no user interaction (UI:N). The scope is changed (S:C), meaning the vulnerability affects resources beyond the initially vulnerable component. Confidentiality impact is high (C:H), integrity impact is low (I:L), and availability impact is none (A:N). The exploitability is currently unknown with no known exploits in the wild. No specific affected versions are listed, but the vulnerability is confirmed in Microsoft Copilot Studio. The vulnerability was reserved in June 2024 and published in August 2024. This SSRF flaw could allow attackers to access internal services or sensitive data that should be protected behind firewalls or network segmentation, potentially leading to data breaches or further exploitation within an organization's network.
Potential Impact
For European organizations, the impact of this SSRF vulnerability in Microsoft Copilot Studio can be significant, especially for enterprises relying on this product for AI-driven development or automation workflows. The high confidentiality impact means sensitive internal data or configuration details could be exposed to attackers, potentially including intellectual property, customer data, or internal network topology. Since the vulnerability requires authentication but no user interaction, attackers who have compromised or obtained valid credentials could exploit this flaw to escalate their access or move laterally within the network. This could lead to data leakage, compliance violations (e.g., GDPR breaches), and reputational damage. The changed scope indicates that the attack could affect other components or services beyond Copilot Studio itself, increasing the risk of broader compromise. Given the critical role Microsoft products often play in European enterprises and public sector organizations, exploitation could disrupt business operations or expose sensitive government or corporate data. Additionally, the lack of known exploits currently provides a window for mitigation, but organizations should act promptly to reduce risk.
Mitigation Recommendations
1. Immediate mitigation should include restricting access to Microsoft Copilot Studio to only trusted and necessary users, enforcing strong authentication and monitoring for unusual access patterns. 2. Network segmentation should be reviewed and enforced to limit the ability of Copilot Studio to make arbitrary network requests, especially to internal services that do not need to be accessed by this product. 3. Implement strict egress filtering and firewall rules to control outbound requests from the Copilot Studio environment, minimizing the attack surface for SSRF exploitation. 4. Monitor logs and network traffic for anomalous requests originating from Copilot Studio that could indicate SSRF attempts. 5. Apply the official security patches or updates from Microsoft as soon as they become available; in the absence of patches, consider temporary disabling or limiting the use of affected features. 6. Conduct internal security assessments and penetration tests focusing on SSRF vectors within Copilot Studio deployments. 7. Educate administrators and users about the risks of SSRF and the importance of credential security since authentication is required for exploitation. 8. Coordinate with Microsoft support and stay updated on advisories related to this vulnerability for any new mitigation guidance or exploit information.
For access to advanced analysis and higher rate limits, contact root@offseq.com
Technical Details
- Data Version
- 5.1
- Assigner Short Name
- microsoft
- Date Reserved
- 2024-06-11T22:36:08.222Z
- Cisa Enriched
- true
- Cvss Version
- 3.1
- State
- PUBLISHED
Threat ID: 682cd0f81484d88663aeb2b4
Added to database: 5/20/2025, 6:59:04 PM
Last enriched: 7/4/2025, 4:27:21 AM
Last updated: 8/7/2025, 10:30:26 AM
Views: 13
Related Threats
CVE-2025-52621: CWE-346 Origin Validation Error in HCL Software BigFix SaaS Remediate
MediumCVE-2025-52620: CWE-20 Improper Input Validation in HCL Software BigFix SaaS Remediate
MediumCVE-2025-52619: CWE-209 Generation of Error Message Containing Sensitive Information in HCL Software BigFix SaaS Remediate
MediumCVE-2025-52618: CWE-89 Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') in HCL Software BigFix SaaS Remediate
MediumCVE-2025-43201: An app may be able to unexpectedly leak a user's credentials in Apple Apple Music Classical for Android
UnknownActions
Updates to AI analysis are available only with a Pro account. Contact root@offseq.com for access.
External Links
Need enhanced features?
Contact root@offseq.com for Pro access with improved analysis and higher rate limits.