CVE-2026-116176VulnerabilityPublished 25 Oct 2026Updated 29 Oct 2026

vLLM from 0.9.2 before 0.24.0 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability that allows API callers to force

Affects vllmSource GCVE Database

Compare

Authoritative record:CVE-2026-116176· High 8.8

Not known to be exploited · CVSS 8.8 High : upgrade to 0.24.0 soon.

Data as of 29 Oct 2026, 14:41 UTC

CVSS 4.0 base score

8.8High

How severe the flaw is on the 0–10 CVSS scale.

Thin evidence

One scorer or none

CVSS scores by source
CNA (VulnCheck)	CVSS 4.0	8.8
CNA (VulnCheck)	CVSS 3.1	8.2

EPSS: 0.3% chance of exploitation in 30 days – higher than 24% of CVEsExploit Prediction Scoring System: the likelihood attackers will use this flaw soon.
Patch: Available – fixed in 0.24.0

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Attack Vector: Network
Attack Complexity: Low
Attack Requirements: None
Privileges Required: None
User Interaction: None
Vulnerable system confidentiality: High
Vulnerable system integrity: None
Vulnerable system availability: Low
Subsequent system confidentiality: None
Subsequent system integrity: None
Subsequent system availability: None

Bold values are the worst case: easiest to exploit or largest impact.

Attack Vector: Network: The vulnerable system is bound to the network stack and the set of possible attackers extends beyond the other options listed below, up to and including the entire Internet. Such a vulnerability is often termed “remotely exploitable” and can be thought of as an attack being exploitable at the protocol level one or more network hops away (e.g., across one or more routers).
Attack Complexity: Low: The attacker must take no measurable action to exploit the vulnerability. The attack requires no target-specific circumvention to exploit the vulnerability. An attacker can expect repeatable success against the vulnerable system.
Attack Requirements: None: The successful attack does not depend on the deployment and execution conditions of the vulnerable system. The attacker can expect to be able to reach the vulnerability and execute the exploit under all or most instances of the vulnerability.
Privileges Required: None: The attacker is unauthorized prior to attack, and therefore does not require any access to settings or files of the vulnerable system to carry out an attack.
User Interaction: None: The vulnerable system can be exploited without interaction from any human user, other than the attacker.
Vulnerable system confidentiality: High: There is a total loss of confidentiality, resulting in all information within the Vulnerable System being divulged to the attacker. Alternatively, access to only some restricted information is obtained, but the disclosed information presents a direct, serious impact. For example, an attacker steals the administrator's password, or private encryption keys of a web server.
Vulnerable system integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the Vulnerable System.
Vulnerable system availability: Low: Performance is reduced or there are interruptions in resource availability. Even if repeated exploitation of the vulnerability is possible, the attacker does not have the ability to completely deny service to legitimate users. The resources in the Vulnerable System are either partially available all of the time, or fully available only some of the time, but overall there is no direct, serious consequence to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system confidentiality: None: There is no loss of confidentiality within the Subsequent System or all confidentiality impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system integrity: None: There is no loss of integrity within the Subsequent System or all integrity impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.
Subsequent system availability: None: There is no impact to availability within the Subsequent System or all availability impact is constrained to the Vulnerable System.

Definitions: FIRST CVSS v4.0 specification.

Exploitation evidence

Disclosed: evidence found.
CVE published 25 Oct 2026
Detectable: no evidence on record.
No public nuclei template indexed
Weaponized: no evidence on record.
No public exploit code indexed in Metasploit or Exploit-DB
Exploited in the wildExploited: no evidence on record.
Not in CISA KEV and no source reports exploitation
Observed by OffSeq MirageSeen by Mirage: no evidence on record.
No attack traffic recorded by OffSeq Mirage sensors

A missing step is not evidence of safety. Sources: cve.org (opens in a new tab), the Metasploit, Exploit-DB and nuclei-templates index as of 29 Oct 2026.

Disclosed: The CVE record is public on cve.org. Its publication is t = 0.
Detectable: A public nuclei template can find exposed instances, for defenders and attackers alike.
Weaponized: A Metasploit exploit module or Exploit-DB entry exists (Metasploit scanner modules do not count), or CISA SSVC or the CVSS exploit maturity reports a public proof of concept.
Exploited in the wild: CISA KEV lists it, CISA SSVC rates exploitation active, or a source reports attacks.
Observed by OffSeq Mirage: OffSeq Mirage honeypot sensors recorded attack traffic for this CVE, or found exposed hosts without attack traffic.

Moments are spaced evenly, not to scale; a dashed line marks a gap of six months or more. Deltas count from t = 0. Sources that give only a date (CISA KEV, Exploit-DB, or a time of exactly 00:00Z) read “same day” rather than hours. Metasploit modules carry the flaw’s disclosure date, not their release date, and nuclei templates carry no date, so both appear above but not on the timeline.

What to do

Upgrade vllm to 0.24.0.

Affected software

Product	Affected	Fixed in
PyPIvllm`pkg:pypi/vllm`Other threats	Affected 0.9.2 – 0.23.0 >=0.9.2 <0.24.0 28 affected builds	Fixed in 0.24.0

Check your own hosts for these packages with threat-finder (opens in a new tab), our free open-source scanner.

AI-suggested

A patch is available and should be applied by upgrading vLLM to version 0.24.0 or later. No other mitigation or temporary workaround is indicated by the vendor advisory. Applying the official fix fully remediates the vulnerability.

Description

vLLM versions from 0.9.2 up to but not including 0.24.0 contain a server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability. This flaw allows API callers to embed a decoded address in the X-Request-Id header, forcing outbound connections. Exploitation can cause a P2pNcclConnector prefill worker to connect to an attacker-controlled host, potentially leaking NCCL unique_id and KV-cache tensors or blocking the worker. The vulnerability is rated high severity with a CVSS score of 8.2. A fix is available in version 0.24.0.

Impact

Successful exploitation allows remote attackers to induce server-side request forgery, causing outbound connections to attacker-controlled hosts. This can lead to leakage of sensitive NCCL unique_id and KV-cache tensor data, which may compromise confidentiality. Additionally, attackers can block the worker process, resulting in partial denial of service. The vulnerability does not impact integrity but has high confidentiality impact and low availability impact.

Summary

The vLLM software versions from 0.9.2 before 0.24.0 are affected by an SSRF vulnerability where attackers can manipulate the X-Request-Id header to force outbound connections from the server. This leads to a P2pNcclConnector prefill worker establishing a ZeroMQ connection to an attacker host, which can result in leakage of sensitive NCCL unique_id and KV-cache tensors or cause denial of service by blocking the worker. The vulnerability has a CVSS 3.1 base score of 8.2 (high severity) with network attack vector, low attack complexity, no privileges required, and no user interaction needed. The issue is fixed in vLLM version 0.24.0.

References

Community reviews

Loading reviews…

Exploitation evidence

What to do

Affected software

Description

AI analysisMachine-generated, updated 29 Oct 2026, 11:19 UTC

Technical details

References

Community reviews

Related threats